F7 Series - lack of Feature Update compared to FR x55/x65

Hi,

Update 20250402 - many websites relayed the information

---

Compared to Forerunner 965 the most similar model from FR

Update Fenix 7 FR 965 Feature F7 changelog
2025-Q2 ongoing ongoing ongoing ongoing
2025-Q2 no Yes Breathing Variations Support
2025-Q1 no Yes Strength workouts for Garmin Run and Cycling Coach  
2025-Q1 no Yes Passcode  
2025-Q1 Yes Yes Workout Execution Score Improvements(from 2024-Q4) not mention - beta
2025-Q1 Yes Yes Body Battery Trueup not mention - beta
2025-Q1 no no Keyboard Enhancements  
2024-Q4 no Yes Garmin Coach Strength Training Plane  
2024-Q4 no Yes Workout Execution Score Improvements  
2024-Q4 Yes Yes Lactate Threshold Auto Detection not mention - Public
2024-Q4 Yes Yes FTP Auto Destection not mention - Public
2024-Q4 no Yes Meditation Activity  

----

---

Sub-Component discrepancy acreeos family. Until now it was aligned across these 3 watch series

FR x65/x55

22.xx

Fenix 8

13.xx

Fenix 7

20.xx

  • NFC: 3.5.3
  • WLT: 3.2.13
  • NFC: 3.5.3
  • WLT: 3.2.13
  • NFC: 3.4.8
  • WLT: 3.2.8
  • lets lay our facts out so that they're clear.

    • The Fenix 7 and 7 Pro have not received all features offered on the Fenix 8
    • Some (not all) people have developed an assumption that devices 1 or 2 generations old would continue to receive the majority, if not all of the features on the latest devices
    • Garmin have never made a claim that they will backport features to older devices

    Let's go over the facts:

    • The Fenix 7 Pro and Epix Pro stopped receiving feature updates roughly 18 months after release.

    • Garmin has backported new features to cheaper Forerunner models but not to the Fenix 7 or Epix series.

    • Users have repeatedly asked about this discrepancy.

    • Garmin has not provided any response, despite seeing these questions, and has even locked several threads on the topic.

    • Since Garmin has never explicitly promised to backport features, this means users have no way of knowing how long their devices will be supported by meaningful feature updates.

    My conclusion from above mentioned is what I said before:

    • It is important for users to know about this Garmin's practice since it is obviously intended behavior.
    • If Garmin had a fair update policy, they wouldn’t need to avoid the discussion.
  • The only fact here seems to be that you and a number of other customers are upset about not having their assumptions met. I hope we can both agree on that.

    There are many more facts in this thread, from my and other people's posts but you are still trying to dismiss them as you are trying to dismiss the key fact that caused all this mess, so let's repeat it:

    this thread is not about hunches, it is about actual lack of feature updates. 

    Just so that we are clear. 

    Just got my Fenix 7pro and now this? It feels like we've been completely abandoned. Garmin, this is NOT how you treat customers who invest in your premium products.

    Exactly my point. 

  • I suspect the Fenix ​​7/Pro branch has a manufacturing defect that they haven't been able to fix through software and their constant failed firmware.
    I've been tracking the different firmwares and there's no way I can get a correct measurement on my runs (compared to a Suunto Vertical).

    17.28 loss of -200m
    19.41 loss of -130m
    20.16 loss of -450m
    20.22 loss of -400m (left hand)
    20.22 loss of -210m (right hand)

    The bug has been reported and according to Laurie, it will be included in the next version. But it's been over 15 days and nothing has happened. They just posted that an engineer doesn't have it in their update path and that only one user (me) had reported it (with so many forum posts about incorrect distances, it seems absurd to me).

    So, if they don't want to update with new functionality (when even older models are getting updates), they don't even want to fix problems with the watch. (15 days for a detected critical patch seems absurd to me), customer service is somewhat rude, and it's obvious the watch has a defect that makes it unaffordable to continue releasing more patches.

    The problem is how we verify it.

  • But it's been over 15 days and nothing has happened.

    4 days ago beta version 21.04 was released. But those who had problem with measuring distance still have it: forums.garmin.com/.../distance-measurement-inaccurate

  • Unfortunately, there is no correction in the walking activities, which was where we found the problem :(

    Fixed BLE sensor names clearing.
    Fixed crash on jump rope activities.
    Fixed crash when failing to pair headphones.
    Fixed grade not updating.
    Fixed pairing with CT10.
    Fixed possible crash during long activities.
    Fixed possible crash when moving golf pin position.
    Fixed sensors not automatically pairing.
    Fixed toggling auto broadcast heart rate.

  • They just posted that an engineer doesn't have it in their update path and that only one user (me) had reported it (with so many forum posts about incorrect distances, it seems absurd to me).

    I have reported it both directly via PM with Garmin-Laurie --AND-- a ticket to support.

    My ticket was opened on March 3rd. # 29494388K1

  • I have reported it both directly via PM with Garmin-Laurie --AND-- a ticket to support.

    This and similar problems (with measuring distance) have certainly been reported by more users.

    It is also true that different departments of Garmin do not communicate with each other, so the same bug could have been reported by several people on the Fenix ​​7 forum, several on the Epix forum, others on the Beta Program forum and still others via support.

    It's ridiculous, but that's how work is organized at Garmin...

  • We reported this a month ago, starting with FW 20.16. According to version 20.22, it was fixed.

    Given Garmin's way of working, it's very likely that they outsource their development teams (hence the division). I've only seen one software development company that does this poorly (buggy updates, denial of errors, very long deadlines for fixes, bureaucracy): TATA.

  • There are many more facts in this thread, from my and other people's posts but you are still trying to dismiss them as you are trying to dismiss the key fact that caused all this mess,

    No I fully accept that you guys are super p*ssed about not having your expectation met. What I'm trying to do is explain why it's happening based upon Garmin's likely strategy. My point is that it makes no sense for Garmin to give the latest Fenix 8 features away for free if it allows the customer to avoid purchasing a new device and also doesn't extract any further revenue. The customer churn isnt there if you look at the latest Outdoor sales. People are buying/upgrading like wildfire. There really isnt the strong dissatisfaction signal you guys think there is.

    That said, I think you guys will eventually get what you're asking for. Perhaps Garmin will adopt the Whoop model and sell a locked Fenix for $500, requiring an ongoing $20 per month subscription to unlock all metrics. Perhaps it'll come in the form of a once-off "metrics pack" upgrade for $300 would you bring you up to the latest Fenix 8 firmware. Either way they'll find some mechanism to give you what you're looking for, but it wont be free.

    Shareholders *love* ongoing revenue streams. We've got a taste of it with Connect+ and we're bound to see more and more of this kind of ensh*itfication unfortunately. But hey, it's what you're calling for.

  • It's just that my wife's Forerunner 265 get it while the Fenix 7 Pro that's newer, doesn't. Make that make sense.