Fenix 6 Pro GPS Problem accuracy

becouse in the same circumstances 700$ sport computer has much worse accuracy than even 30$ sport band.

We dont know it because it is not validated with a footpod/Stryd. I think who wanna get accurate distance (trail or normal running) must use these , the GPS datas (and the distance from these points) are so inaccurate with low speed + multipath errors with these wristwatches...

Please post the original .fit file from the watch. Or a link to the connect upload, thats fine to....

3974713 said:

I didnt write it becouse I thought it is obvious.
I (black line - garmin 6 pro) WAS RUNNING ON THE WHITE ROAD with my friend (green line - garmin 5)

Haha, you've now edited and completed your post.

3974713 said:

what tides? on the lake? Read and think before you post. 

In the original post it wasn't clear whether you run on the road or on the beach. Furthermore from the pic it's still not clear, whether the water is an ocean, a lake or a river. So I've assumed you run on a beach beside an ocean and there are tides. So far I've seen some traces from users that run on a beach at an ocean and they've complained their traces in the water. But they are run at low tide and since Google maps doesn't simulate tides, it's clearly a mapping error. Furthermore there is no scale available for the estimation of the size between road, green trace and black trace.

What's wrong on my interpretation of this, so that you blame me here with your abusive post. Rather you're not able to generate a clear post. Obviously you're a choleric character w/o any technological background which permanently complain about inaccurate traces using old pics. Please keep in mind that in the meantime there are made some enhancements in the accuracy of the traces.

BTW: Since you downgrade my post and upgrade many of your own post, that shows what kind of poster you're. It's rather that you think before you post.

Luko79 said:

We dont know it because it is not validated with a footpod/Stryd. I think who wanna get accurate distance (trail or normal running) must use these , the GPS datas (and the distance from these points) are so inaccurate with low speed + multipath errors with these wristwatches...

I have been running (actually walking) numerous tests this month on my daily dog walk with different watches and with/without Stryd. Day to day there will be small and very rare variations for social distancing and backtracking or stopping for "waste management", but I try always to walk the same course. Most trails I use are single file, so deviation from the route is minimal.

There is a very clear pattern emerging, with Stryd producing figures around 3.9km each day and the 6X without Stryd producing figures around 4km. So, whatever is right or wrong, it does not seem that the 6X is cutting short the distance covered. If slow pace is part of the problem a dog walk is surely a good example of slow pace. :-)

Here are some results from recent days.

The terrain is a mixture of suburban streets, woodland and open fields. The tracks below are from my 6X (green) and V800 (red) today and also the 6X (blue) yesterday.

You are right. This post reminded me how much time and money I have lost since september 2019 becouse garmin experts forced me to think that the device I got is better than it really is.
There is absolutely nobody in this post who post information that he had such problems and FIXED it and proved it. And that was the reason of this post. Somebody wanted to contact people who HAD such problem. He didnt want to hear how great is the device, or to change settings. We all already did it. 

3974713 said:

garmin experts forced me

No-one forces you.

3974713 said:

becouse in the same circumstances 700$ sport computer has much worse accuracy than even 30$ sport band.

So feel free to send back your F6 and buy $30 watch. With this you save money, time and nerves.

I've looked a long time thoroughly for tests of many watches of many brands and I've found that all watches have the same issues (GPS and OHR). So at present we've to live with this. But hopefully there would be enhancements in the hardware, especially the Sony chip seems the problem. I think it's mainly a problem of the hardware, not of the tuning by SW. Tuning ony by SW has the disadvantage that "One man's meat is another man's suffering".

In the ratings at Amazon there is a user which complains that his Berlin Marathon was measured by Vantage only with 39.88km. Since he run faster than expected, this is advantagous . But in my marathons so far I've had only the reverse and therefore passed my planned finish time .

"We dont know it..." i wrote it about my friend's Vantage V's track what i posted,