Hey!
Im not impressed at all with gps ( all band bla bla) .
check those 2. my old 935 and 955S
connect.garmin.com/.../9066698646
https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/9052507601
one with 955s only
Hey!
Im not impressed at all with gps ( all band bla bla) .
check those 2. my old 935 and 955S
connect.garmin.com/.../9066698646
https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/9052507601
one with 955s only
There's something fishy with the way Connect displays activities. Almost like it's undersampling the points just to display faster. I did a run and that track is extremely detailed in Connect in…
here is my last ride in Garmin Connect and on Strava (from same FIT file), as You see , the Connect track is awful jaggy due to displaying limitation, the Strava ones is perfect, as the 3rd one too.
I mean, there's a difference between a plot and the gps itself...
At most the recordings are every second and who knows, maybe plotting is processed some other way. It's mountainbiking and speed is…
So far I have down a couple of activities while wearing both the 935 and the 955 in opposite wrists. The 955 far out performs in the GPS accuracy.
Track clips from Garmin 935:
GPS plus GLONASS. Battery went from 99% to 92%
Mostly open area:
Forest covered area:
Track clips from Garmin 955:
All systems plus Multi frequency. Battery went from 78% to 72%.
Mostly open area:
Forest covered area:
with the 955 you can actually tell what I did even when I went around the interior of a covered pavilion. The tracks overlayed precisely. With the 935 it was just a mess.
SA
Guess this settle the doubts
935
955
as much as i complain about a lot of bugs with the watch, i continue to be impressed with the GPS. i've settled into using All Satellites as it seems more than good enough even under the tree covered places i run. today i did a few laps around the track and wanted to see how well it did with tracking with respect to lanes. i started off in the outer lane then rain the remaining 8 laps on the inner lane. here is the track on Strava:
