This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Why I'm done with my Fenix 6

I just returned my Fenix 6 as defective, though I suspect the defects on my watch are shared by almost every watch in the line. I did so reluctantly. I really, really wanted to like it. On the off chance that someone from Garmin reads this message, I wanted to list my reasons. Nobody else has to agree with me, and feel free to ignore this or tell me why I'm wrong.

1. In 2021, instant pace is still a joke. It's been 20 years since Garmin introduced the first Forerunner. If they still can't tell you how fast you're running, they need to stop advertising it as a feature. Here is my pace from a 10k race I ran on 11/25/2020.



Tell me if you think this is fit for purpose. After this race I bit the bullet and bought a Stryd pod. For a while I was content. Then I realized my $800 "premium smartwatch" is literally now just a Bluetooth receiver for data from $300 worth of other sensors (foot pod, chest strap). How stupid do I have to be to think this is an acceptable solution?

2. Backlight-gate

My watch had the low-contrast blue backlight. I understand that it's not a defect; it's basically the same backlight as every generation of Garmin before it. My issue is mainly how Garmin handled the situation. If you have a high contrast backlight, how much would I have to pay you to switch to a washed-out blue display? Pretty sure the answer is greater than $0. One display is clearly higher quality (higher contrast, far better viewing angle). But Garmin insists that they are completely interchangeable, refuses to acknowledge that any rational customer would prefer one over the other, and charges the same price for both. Buying one of their watches is currently a game of getting a lucky draw from a grab bag. No thanks, I'd prefer to know what I'm buying.

3. New Years-gate

This was the straw that broke the camel's back. I understand that the problem is (most likely) on Sony's end, but I blame Garmin. I also blame COROS, Suunto, Polar, etc. The difference is that Garmin has been in business for 30 years and should not have ended up in this situation. In GPS, if you can't get date and time right, literally nothing else matters. Garmin contracted out the most critical component of their watches to a company that had no track record in the GPS market, and as it turns out, didn't understand or anticipate that leap years are a thing. Issues like this are the utterly predictable consequence, and so I absolutely blame Garmin. Even if it's an easy fix and minor inconvenience, it's an issue that should never have happened in the first place.

And for the record, the Sony chipset quality has been subpar even before the New Year's fiasco. Firmware 4.80 improved things to the point that it was *almost* as good as my Forerunner 230. Is that worth $800? Not to me.

So, that's it, I'm done with the Fenix 6, and maybe Garmin entirely. If I am a sucker maybe you will see me over on the Fenix 7 forum someday. But hopefully I've come to my senses and this will be it. Happy New Year, all.

  • See ya.

    Apple watch sounds like is more suited to your needs.

  • Hello, I totally agree with you the fenix 6 at 899 € it is an obvious theft it is much less precise than the fenix 3, I just asked for a return to Garmin after a week still nothing !!!

  • Just to give a bit of a counter perspective...  

    I have both a Fenix 6s, and an Apple Watch (v5), and use both.  For some of the reasons listed as well as the awful WHR broadcasting on the F6, I wear the apple watch daily.  It is a fantastic smartwatch (assuming you have drunk the Apple cool aide, to begin with).  But the workout tracking is not even close to the Fenix.  NOT EVEN CLOSE.  So I swap them out when I go for a run or a swim.  (I also have an Edge and a chest strap for the bike).

  • Sorry to hear your frustration dealing with Garmin directly. I bought my watch from Amazon, and fortunately they are offering an extended return period through Jan 31 due to COVID and shipping delays.

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 4 years ago

    I am compulsive when it comes to fitness devices. I have tried and tested just about every single brand out there. I recently sold my 6x sapphire because I wanted to try the new fitbit's that came out and the new apple watch series 6. The fitbit's went back to bestbuy after only a few workouts because the GPS was between a quarter and a half mile off in some cases, and the HR was all over the place. The apple watch was good as far as HR went and ok as far as GPS (but only using the watch's GPS), and the fitness features on the apple watch are just too basic. Plus I could just not get past having to charge the thing every day and sometimes twice a day.

    After all that wasted time and money I wound up getting another fenix 6x sapphire.

    Good luck finding a better device than a Garmin, because there aren't any.

  • Thanks. My plan is to revert back to my old Fenix 5, for another 10 years if I have to. It has all of the same flaws as the Fenix 6, but I'm done pretending that Garmin's Next Big Thing will magically fix anything. I'm also looking into the Polar Grit X, which gets really solid reviews from DCR and other places.

  • I am with you on some things. I have tried several Polar watches and I didn't need to test any since their step counting is out of this world. I get at least twice as many steps as with my quite accurate Garmin. Steps aren't everything but if a manufacturer doesn't get that right in many years they had time to do so, then no thank you. I like their watches. But 10.000 on my tracker worn on my pants vs 11.000 on my Garmin vs 20.000 on my Polar. Steps are the activity we do during the whole day, so important to our health. And Polar's counting is just beyond ridiculous. Something Garmin gets right actually. Best with Samsung. AW has around 1000-2000 Steps more with 10.000 steps on my Garmin, Fitbit around 3000-4000, Polar 100% more. Sorry, but no. 

    Don't know why no reviewer mentions this. 

  • On the off chance that someone from Garmin reads this message, I wanted to list my reasons.

    And then.... 

  • I have compared the Fenix 6 with the Grit X, Suunto 9 and Coros Vertix. The Grit X is a great watch for a road runner, is less good as a trail runner watch. The GPS is on par with the Fenix, but distance measurement and instant pace are better. However, they are not spectacular. I would NOT use the instant pace to pace myself on a race. The Stryd is still better on that. But at least, the watch isn't 800€. It's MUCh simpler, but has very solid performance metrics. The suggested workouts are quite fun for instance, I like it. It's a much less complete watch though (no map, no music, screen is smaller, you can't personalize much, and everyday battery life is really disappointing (not a week). It's a good watch, but very different from the Fenix, so it's mostly about knowing what you really use or not. I would NOT call it a great nature watch, it's still closer to the DNA of Polar, the road. 

    Coros has a very good offer though, if you need better GPS performances & great battery. But performance metrics are... lacking :-P 

  • I wouldn’t mind getting the next generations of 9 Baro or Vertix but Fenix stays my daily driver.