Wrist Heart Rate Accuracy

Former Member
Former Member

I have a fenix 5 that I wear doing HIIT workouts.  The watch's wrist HR monitor has never been able to register more than 120 BPM when my actual heart rate would range between 140-170 during workouts.  Because of this I wear a heart rate monitor to get accurate results instead of relying on the watch's monitor- the chest strap is always right on point.  The wrist monitor on the watch works fine when running or biking, just not when working out in the gym or registering quick increases in my heart rate when sprinting.  I had a fitbit ionic and a fitbit versa before this watch and neither had any issues keeping up with my heart rate with their wrist monitors throughout my workouts - even during sprints - I would check them by measuring my pulse by hand through the first few weeks of working out with them and I have to say they were both extremely accurate.  I have been a little frustrated with my fenix 5 that it is not even remotely accurate when tracking most of my workouts while the fitbit does not have any issues.  I love everything else about the Garmin watches though and am looking at upgrading to the Fenix 6 solar.  Before I do, I wanted to see if anyone has had any better luck with the wrist HR monitor on the Fenix 6.  I read a number of threads about 8-12 month ago talking about the same issue with the Fenix 6, however, see that a number of firmware updates have come out since then.  Does anyone know if the latest software updates have improved this?  Also I will note that I have tried a number of fixes mentioned in a few threads already (reset watch, wear watch as tight as possible to prevent it from moving around on the wrist, wear watch on opposite side of wrist, shave wrist hair to not impede with sensor), however, now of these things helped with the issue.  I would really appreciate getting some feedback on this.    

  • For me, it still doesn't work at all. I have to wear a chest strap for every activity that I do. And if I have the unfortunate pleasure of relying on my F6 (strap battery dies, forgot it) I am just reminded of how frustrating and terrible the wrist HR monitor is on the F6. My two-cents. 

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 4 years ago in reply to 3704102

    I really appreciate the reply.  That is really too bad to hear...I was hoping one of these latest updates would have fixed the issue.  

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 4 years ago

    Please do not waste your money. I went through the same process. Started with the 5X Plus Sapphire, went to the 6, then the 6X pro sapphire and also tried the 6 solar. The OHR sensor is literally terrible on all of them. It only works well with steady state running. It doesn't track right on walks, hikes, stairclimbing, and bike rides (maybe sometimes on bike rides). It's offensively bad at the absurd price. I've tested it against an Apple watch 4, 5, and 6 and they are all leaps and bounds ahead of this device. They respond faster in almost every case and are more accurate in every case. 

    If you care about HR data, and don't want to inconvenience yourself by having a chest strap on, don't buy this watch. It was my biggest regret purchase of 2020 and I'm glad I had the chance to return it. If you can look past the HR monitor, it's an amazing device and highly capable largely because of the battery life and maps. I did some insane stuff with that watch and was glad to have it on me, like running a half in the grand canyon, navigating the presidential traverse in NH which was a 21 mile hike and much more and the maps came in really hand as did the battery life, but in my opinion, for the price, it needs to be the full package or nothing. If you have all trails and a phone with a small portable battery back, you can accomplish all of that stuff with a slight inconvenience and save yourself a thousand dollars. I'd say if you can find it preowned for 400-500 it would be worth it despite it's major flaw because the other categories it excels in are legitimate. Your call though. I quit with it, but as you can tell, still enraged by how badly it sucks.

  • All you comments about WHR performance are well documented by Garmin including:

    The wrist monitor on the watch works fine when running or biking, just not when working out in the gym or registering quick increases in my heart rate when sprinting.

    As you appear to be aware there are numerous posts about wrist heart rate and performance differences between people - works for some, doesn't work for others.

    Long story short, it's not an issue that can be 'fixed' as there are too many physiological and physical variables involved for it to work 100% for everyone 100% of the time. Improvements for some lead to worse performance for others as Garmin continue to tweak the software and sensors in a bid to make it work well for most.

    If you believe the Apple Watch is better because someone posting here tells you it is, all well and good. However, I can assure you there are similar complaints made about the Apple Watch in a number of different forums for instance - https://www.reddit.com/r/AppleWatch/comments/jcwvr8/any_tips_for_improving_heart_rate_monitoring/.

    https://www.conferencesthatwork.com/index.php/technology/2019/10/how-to-fix-apple-watch-heart-rate-monitor-not-working/

    Just like here there are of course posts lauding its performance.

    All is not always greener on the other side of the fence. FWIW, I had an Apple Watch for a while and found it differed little in terms of performance from my Garmin watches. Except in one particular area - tracking during an open water swim was better - it drew a better line on the map although there was little to no difference in distance and pace.

    Before you take any recommendations from anyone posting here about the virtues of other watches, go check the forums (although in the case of Polar that's not possible as they have no consumer forums). And of course, if Fitbit works for you then perhaps that is the best watch for you.

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 4 years ago

    Row Concept 2

    Polar H7  average heart rate 132 /  max 142

    Wrist Heart Rate average heart rate 131  /  max 143

  •   I had a fitbit ionic and a fitbit versa before this watch and neither had any issues keeping up with my heart rate with their wrist
    they were both extremely accurate.
    frustrated with my fenix 5 that it is not even remotely accurate when tracking most of my workouts while the fitbit does not have any issues.
    read a number of threads about 8-12 month ago talking about the same issue with the Fenix 6,
    am looking at upgrading to the Fenix 6 solar

    Once broken down, it makes perfect sense.