I promised to perform a test, while wearing both watches and here it is. The 5k run below is a mixture of urban running+ a part in trail-like conditions
Setup: F6XPS on my left wrist (GPS+GALILEO; every second recording+latest beta GPS firmware 4.31)
AWS5: 4-5 cm lower than the Garmin
Both used their optical HR sensors only;
The Stryd app was used to record the run on the AW and I listened to music via my Aeropex via cellular.
AWS5: https://www.strava.com/activities/3506223312
F6XPS: https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/4984264860
http://www.mygpsfiles.com/app/#neOqqTV4
HR during the run looks roughly in line on both watches with average values of 151 (AW) vs 153 (Garmin)
I also tested the optical HR reading to try and compare and contrast the behaviour of the two watches.
Immediately after saving the respective activities, both were within a few bpms of each other for about two minutes. The AW correctly went down by about 40 bpm a few minutes, while the Garmin barely moved only to go down to the level of the AW about 3 minutes later.
I then did a 100m sprint: AW went up to 140, while the Garmin only got to 103; I manually took my pulse and the AW was correct.
Let me know your thoughts!