Acknowledged
CIQQA-3738

Fix workout calendar

In the garmin connect app you can see your garmin workouts planned by a 'garmin coach' but when moving a workout you get the popup that you can't have 3 following workouts in 3 days. But it also counts the workout you are trying to move.

For example, I have workouts planned on tuesday, thursday and sunday this week. I can't move the workout from tuesday to wednesday because it then still sees the workout from tuesday (which i am trying to move) and counts  3 days with workouts (tuesday/wednesday/thursday). This is very annoying.

Maybe you could also consider just making the popup denyable (not just 'okay' but also 'I read the recommendation, continue editing the schedule', because I think people are very capable of changing their own workout schedule (if you want to make multiple changes at once you don't want to be bothered by this limitation).

Parents
  • This isn't the first Garmin bug of this nature (incorrectly counting an existing item to be changed towards a limit) and it won't be the last.

    Previous-gen watches have a limit of 2 unique Connect IQ data fields per activity.

    If you try to add more than 2 CIQ fields to an activity, the UI will prevent you from doing so, by limiting your selection to one of 2 already-installed fields (because it's ok to install multiple instances of the same field).

    Unfortunately, this logic is also incorrectly applied when you try to change an already-installed CIQ field, meaning that if you have 2 CIQ fields (call them "A" and "B") and you want to change one of them to a different CIQ field (call it "C"), you can't do so directly - the UI acts like changing one of "A" or "B" will put you over the limit, so it only shows "A" and "B" as choices for a CIQ field to change to. To get around this, first you have to change either "A" or "B" to a non-CIQ field, then change that field to "C".

    Similar to the bug reported here, this is extremely annoying.

    Despite the fact that I've reported this bug over and over again for years, in several different channels, it doesn't look like it'll ever be fixed (at least not in previous-gen watches like FR955 and FR965). 

    Sorry, but I see the same ridiculous kinds of bugs over and over again. Despite the fact that these bugs are called out over and over again:

    - sometimes the specific bug sticks around for years (probably never to be fixed)

    - other times, a bug is fixed, but it comes back years later

    - still other times, a bug is fixed, but similar bugs pop up over and over again, throughout the years

    I thought AI was supposed to replace all the useless human workers and eliminate this kind of problem, huh? Haha oh wait, no one actually suggested that software quality would get better, regardless of AI use. Because let's face it - the vast majority of companies and managers do not care about quality at all (it has always been this way).

Comment
  • This isn't the first Garmin bug of this nature (incorrectly counting an existing item to be changed towards a limit) and it won't be the last.

    Previous-gen watches have a limit of 2 unique Connect IQ data fields per activity.

    If you try to add more than 2 CIQ fields to an activity, the UI will prevent you from doing so, by limiting your selection to one of 2 already-installed fields (because it's ok to install multiple instances of the same field).

    Unfortunately, this logic is also incorrectly applied when you try to change an already-installed CIQ field, meaning that if you have 2 CIQ fields (call them "A" and "B") and you want to change one of them to a different CIQ field (call it "C"), you can't do so directly - the UI acts like changing one of "A" or "B" will put you over the limit, so it only shows "A" and "B" as choices for a CIQ field to change to. To get around this, first you have to change either "A" or "B" to a non-CIQ field, then change that field to "C".

    Similar to the bug reported here, this is extremely annoying.

    Despite the fact that I've reported this bug over and over again for years, in several different channels, it doesn't look like it'll ever be fixed (at least not in previous-gen watches like FR955 and FR965). 

    Sorry, but I see the same ridiculous kinds of bugs over and over again. Despite the fact that these bugs are called out over and over again:

    - sometimes the specific bug sticks around for years (probably never to be fixed)

    - other times, a bug is fixed, but it comes back years later

    - still other times, a bug is fixed, but similar bugs pop up over and over again, throughout the years

    I thought AI was supposed to replace all the useless human workers and eliminate this kind of problem, huh? Haha oh wait, no one actually suggested that software quality would get better, regardless of AI use. Because let's face it - the vast majority of companies and managers do not care about quality at all (it has always been this way).

Children
No Data