DIY Data Field

Former Member
Former Member
Application is still pending to be approved, topic is created to be used as a communication hub during and after public beta test.

Do/Design It Yourself Data Field.

Disclaimer:
Application has hundreds of use-cases due to fully user-configurable setup, therefore it is prone to bugs. This project is not sponsored and I'm the only developer working on it in my own free time. Although I'd gladly accept reasonable criticism and improvement suggestions, I do not guarantee that bugs will be fixed and new features added in a timely manner/at all. If this approach is not acceptable for you, then, please, do not leave bad reviews just because I didn't resolve your specific case. Thanks for understanding.

Preface:
There's a lot of things custom activity recorders can do, which native Garmin apps cannot, but sometimes there's no need to invent a bicycle if there's one already itching for a ride. Some capabilities like local watch personal records, structured workouts information and advanced running dynamics will most certainly never be exposed to ConnectIQ API layer, therefore it's sometimes more efficient to use native software, but no one prevents us to use it with a twist. The main idea of this data-field type application is to give user a tool to design his own data field layout in WYSIWYG manner. The web application makes that possible providing cross-platform compatibility at the same time the only requirement being the HTML5 compatible browser. This app is not considered to be an ultimate DF which "replaces them all" as there's always something new and intriguing, which developer may envision, but I hope that this data field will help new and existing users to explore the Garmin ConnectIQ capabilities providing some unique features, which I didn't encounter in existing apps.

First things first: there's a web application, which allows to design data field layout and produces configuration string as a result. This configuration string can only be delivered to data field using standard settings means i.e. you will need either Garmin Express installed on compatible PC or Garmin Connect Mobile on your mobile device. Web app uses HTML5 local storage, changes are saved after each user action, therefore it's safe to leave your work half done and proceed from the same point sometime later. I do not own hardware to test with Apple devices, therefore any problems in that department can be explored and fixed only by sending me detailed explanations and, of course, the configuration string itself. Current version with the default layout setup was tested for several weeks in simulator and for several of my personal runs proving to be rather stable to go live, but of course there's no guarantee that this app will function without hitches on your specific device. Currently, I do not have a reliable hosting for my personal web apps, therefore data field designer will reside on Google Apps Engine servers using free account bandwidth/limitations (as there are almost no server-side computations, I think this will suffice for a while) at least if/until it'll become popular enough for the users to complain about page availability. Current implementation with the default layout setup works on the edge of stability and there was also a price to pay during watch code optimization, which lead to efficient but very unreadable code. This means that for older devices there may be no improvements, only bug fixes. But for modern devices like Forerunner735XT and on we still have additional 10kb of available memory, which can be used for new logic like new data values and/or additional app parameters (e.g. waypoints). Sometimes network latency and/or Google servers accessibility seems to impact resources load time and wrong font may be displayed first time the web app is started, to fix this simply press F5 (refresh page) in browser.

Current settings are 4 lines for definition itself (these should be copy/pasted without changes directly from web app), Target Pace for pacemaker values (should be entered as string in <min>:<sec> format, e.g. "5:40" as in min/km) and Milestones, which are just fixed distances comma separated list, they are expressed in kilometers and may contain fractional values using dot delimiter (e.g. 0.5,1,1.5, etc). It'necessary to enter values in kilometers, but they will be converted before display depending on watch settings.

Default setup is considered to be a "component showcase" and consists of basic building blocks:
- Data values, which are simply text representation of corresponding activity information bits like time or speed, for data values it's possible to change screen coordinates, font, color, number of samples to smooth the value over specified amount of seconds and add optional outline for data to become more readable or dynamically colored on less contrast backgrounds; if text font is selected, then it's also possible to append data value with custom text, e.g. create label with value for another data block;
- Data graphs, these are just rolling data value charts, which represent one selected data value over a set period of time, minimum and maximum graph values are adjusted automatically, number of samples is calculated automatically based on width of graph area and graph bar, all of the other options are similar to data values;
- Graphics elements, these are basic graphical primitives, which allow to customize the layout, add visibility to some values etc; parameters for these elements are mostly self explanatory except for two specific elements of type Arc. These may not only serve as a static view elements, but also can be used to represent a dynamic data value in a manner of a progress bar. For this to happen you need to tick the "Variable" option and select base Data value (currently there's only a limited selection, but this may be a subject to change) accompanied by min and max initial values, these range values are indeed initial as when the underlying data value falls outside of this range, then range is adjusted automatically. For example in bundled layout this feature is used to display the progress to the next kilometer: Elapsed distance is selected as a base value, initial range is specified as 0 to 100 (in this case 100 means 1000m, as the distance values are displayed as 00.00), which means that this arc will grow from start angle to the maximum width angle as the elapsed distance increases during activity acting as a progress bar to the next kilometer. When elapsed distance will become greater than 1000 meters, then ranges will be readjusted using the same range difference as before, in this case minimum value will become 1000m while maximum one will increase to 2000m. Here's a little demo of what you can make using variable value arc (this config is created for semi-round devices, copy/paste this configuration string into import window of web app).
AGUAJA[HIWaVFAJNATXDEAODZQVELEUA[HIWaVFAODU]`DEAOEOQVEVE_A[HIWaVFAABG`[DEAOFDQWE`FHA[HIWaVFAABHGRDEAOF[QWFIFRA[HIWaVFAJNA\ODEAOGQQVFSF\A[HIWaVFAOE]CPCWAODZTMELF\A[HIWaVFAAAAAACWAPDWTMELF\ASADILDAPOE]CPFEABAVDVENQAPQAAAFDJCFACB

Selected element options can be adjusted using the properties panel to the right of the designer canvas. In addition to pixel-by-pixel adjustments, designer canvas allows to drag currently selected element. To drag data value it's not necessary to start drag at any specific point, but for graphs and graphical elements the drag point will be determined based on mouse pointer coordinates: e.g. to resize graph area or rectangle click and drag somewhere around the lower right corner, to adjust the radius of circles and direction arrow start drag outside of the outer radius, to change coordinates - click somewhere near the circle center. For the arcs it's currently possible to change start angle and arc width by activating drag-and-drop near the corresponding arc vertex. Touch support for mobile devices is implemented.

There are still some limitations like direction arrow points only to north or some data values available only on high-end devices like power are not yet implemented etc, but as I already mentioned above, this app is subject to improve especially for the newer devices, where there's a lot of memory available even for the data field type of app. The web app is also meant to be improved especially in a direction to provide the nearest possible WYSIWYG snapshot of what you'll actually see on device, but there are also some limitations like, for example, font, which is used as numeric font in the latest Fenix5/FR935 models is not and won't be publicly available (confirmed by Garmin officials explicitly) and I used nearest lookalike, therefore there still may be some couple of pixel differences here and there between device and web app. For these kinds of problems I can only test and fix using the user-provided layouts in specific device simulator as I'm a simple FR230 owner for real testing and I'm afraid this won't change in the nearest year unless generous users will help me to upgrade.

Web app may eventually become mobile application based on the user feedback (but not for the Apple devices, Android only).
  • [..]
    So, currently there are two problems:
    1. Current bike power with "Lap Value" option should give you "median" bike power for current lap, if it's not so then we'll have to understand logical error behind this and for that I'll need either your fit file to run it in simulator or list of raw bike power values with your explanation of expected result value to assemble a unit test.
    2. When current power with "lap" option will begin to provide correct result we may do an interface trick by giving "average power" a "lap" option for better understanding by user although it's still not that obvious for me, frankly, but during definition string encoding we'll replace "average power" with "current power".



    Thanks for the explanations. I deleted the DIY-app from the Edge 520 yesterday, then re-installed it to be sure to get the latest version. I had no chance to test it again since then but will do a test this evening. I'll let you know the results.

    Two days ago when I last tested "current bike power" with lap-option enabled the value was far too high and - most importantly - dropped back to 0 when I stopped pedaling. So this clearly didn't show any average value.
    Also, when you say in 1. above: "...should give you "median"..." you actually mean "average" or "mean", correct? Because that is what you are calculating if you do "value total for the current lap divided by / number of samples for the current lap".

    Regarding 2. above: what isn't obvious to you? An average always is "total sum of data values for a given period of time divided by the number of data values for that period of time". For the average power, this translates into

    "total sum of power values during entire activity / number of samples during entire activity" --> I would expect "average bike power" data field with lap checkbox NOT ticked
    "total sum of power values during lap / number of samples during lap" --> I would expect "average bike power" data field with lap checkbox ticked

    So I'll test tonight and come back to you. Thanks!
  • @ Axti
    @ Easuvorov

    HEUREKA!
    I'm now able to transfer long def-strings with Android.
    QuickEdit Android app does the trick.

    Many thanks to all for their efforts!
  • So, currently there are two problems:
    1. Current bike power with "Lap Value" option should give you "median" bike power for current lap, if it's not so then we'll have to understand logical error behind this and for that I'll need either your fit file to run it in simulator or list of raw bike power values with your explanation of expected result value to assemble a unit test.


    Back from the ride...unfortunately, "current bike power" with lap check box enabled showed the same behaviour as prior to v0.70: value far too high and drops back to 0 when I stop pedaling.

    I attached the FIT-file containing 13 laps with following average power per lap (as per Garmin's average power field):

    Lap Average Power [W]
    1 203
    2 305
    3 112
    4 310
    5 67
    6 334
    7 105
    8 319
    9 48
    10 317
    11 146
    12 306
    13 252

    2017-09-12-17-45-26.fit

    Thanks for looking into this!
  • I defined a circle with dynamic colors based on Current HR.
    But when I test it, the circle is always red. with the Color Set by default or a custom color set with the same HRZones as in the watch and garmin connect.


    Thx for your reply Easuvorov, my HR colors now work very well with the default HR Color Zones.

    Now i'm searching for another thing,
    I try to display the Next Milestone ETA, not the Clock ETA, not the time left, but the estimated total time for finishing the next milestone.
    It is possible ?
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 7 years ago
    Back from the ride...unfortunately, "current bike power" with lap check box enabled showed the same behaviour as prior to v0.70: value far too high and drops back to 0 when I stop pedaling.

    I played with your fit file data and it seems that to match native lap average bike power I need to increase number of samples in our formula even if sample has zero value (previously I excluded such samples completely). Latest version has this update, result seems on par with values from your activity with minor deviations which may be related to rounding. Please, check if this resolves original issue. If it does then I'll update designer application so that "Lap Value" option on "Average Power" will give this result.

  • Former Member
    Former Member over 7 years ago
    I try to display the Next Milestone ETA, not the Clock ETA, not the time left, but the estimated total time for finishing the next milestone.

    Currently its not possible, but I already have another request for new ETA value so I'll try to unify those as internal value ID's are running low in current implementation and I do not want to spend them to different variations of the same value.

  • I played with your fit file data and it seems that to match native lap average bike power I need to increase number of samples in our formula even if sample has zero value (previously I excluded such samples completely). Latest version has this update, result seems on par with values from your activity with minor deviations which may be related to rounding. Please, check if this resolves original issue. If it does then I'll update designer application so that "Lap Value" option on "Average Power" will give this result.


    Yes, data points with value 0 must be handled like any other value >0. A zero value does not contribute to the total sum, but "number of samples" is incremented which leads to a (rather slow) reduction of the average value - which is exactly what should happen if I stop pedaling (i.e. power=0) for a while.

    Did you check that the average does not drop to 0 if current power is 0 for a few samples (approx. 3 seconds)? Because if you only changed the calculation to now include zero samples it does not explain why the average drops to 0 in v0.70. By excluding zero samples the average value should have stuck at the current value (instead of going back to 0)....(?).

    I'll test v0.71 this evening and keep you informed.

  • Former Member
    Former Member over 7 years ago
    Did you check that the average does not drop to 0 if current power is 0 for a few samples (approx. 3 seconds)?

    Each value is defaulted with zero before computation start, previously lap average values were calculated for nonzero samples, now lap average values are updated each second regardless of the value, currently I do not see zeroes in device simulator.

  • Hello easuvorov. Thanks a lot for the clone data fields! I have noticed an issue on my fenix 5 though when installing Clone B and Clone C. The one appears to overwrite the other, so if I install C, B disappears.

    I also can't find the Lap Pace field, but that might be my stupidity

    EDIT: Just figured out the Lap checkbox in the speed field
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 7 years ago
    Thanks a lot for the clone data fields! I have noticed an issue on my fenix 5 though when installing Clone B and Clone C. The one appears to overwrite the other, so if I install C, B disappears.

    It's another issue of messed application ID's (seems that Garmin won't fix this in a while so we'll have to live with that): I've uploaded both clones on the same date and the last one got the ID of the first. In a couple of days I'll remove DIY B (currently has the same ID as original data field) and DIY Clone C (currently has the same ID as DIY Clone B).