DIY Data Field

Former Member
Former Member
Application is still pending to be approved, topic is created to be used as a communication hub during and after public beta test.

Do/Design It Yourself Data Field.

Disclaimer:
Application has hundreds of use-cases due to fully user-configurable setup, therefore it is prone to bugs. This project is not sponsored and I'm the only developer working on it in my own free time. Although I'd gladly accept reasonable criticism and improvement suggestions, I do not guarantee that bugs will be fixed and new features added in a timely manner/at all. If this approach is not acceptable for you, then, please, do not leave bad reviews just because I didn't resolve your specific case. Thanks for understanding.

Preface:
There's a lot of things custom activity recorders can do, which native Garmin apps cannot, but sometimes there's no need to invent a bicycle if there's one already itching for a ride. Some capabilities like local watch personal records, structured workouts information and advanced running dynamics will most certainly never be exposed to ConnectIQ API layer, therefore it's sometimes more efficient to use native software, but no one prevents us to use it with a twist. The main idea of this data-field type application is to give user a tool to design his own data field layout in WYSIWYG manner. The web application makes that possible providing cross-platform compatibility at the same time the only requirement being the HTML5 compatible browser. This app is not considered to be an ultimate DF which "replaces them all" as there's always something new and intriguing, which developer may envision, but I hope that this data field will help new and existing users to explore the Garmin ConnectIQ capabilities providing some unique features, which I didn't encounter in existing apps.

First things first: there's a web application, which allows to design data field layout and produces configuration string as a result. This configuration string can only be delivered to data field using standard settings means i.e. you will need either Garmin Express installed on compatible PC or Garmin Connect Mobile on your mobile device. Web app uses HTML5 local storage, changes are saved after each user action, therefore it's safe to leave your work half done and proceed from the same point sometime later. I do not own hardware to test with Apple devices, therefore any problems in that department can be explored and fixed only by sending me detailed explanations and, of course, the configuration string itself. Current version with the default layout setup was tested for several weeks in simulator and for several of my personal runs proving to be rather stable to go live, but of course there's no guarantee that this app will function without hitches on your specific device. Currently, I do not have a reliable hosting for my personal web apps, therefore data field designer will reside on Google Apps Engine servers using free account bandwidth/limitations (as there are almost no server-side computations, I think this will suffice for a while) at least if/until it'll become popular enough for the users to complain about page availability. Current implementation with the default layout setup works on the edge of stability and there was also a price to pay during watch code optimization, which lead to efficient but very unreadable code. This means that for older devices there may be no improvements, only bug fixes. But for modern devices like Forerunner735XT and on we still have additional 10kb of available memory, which can be used for new logic like new data values and/or additional app parameters (e.g. waypoints). Sometimes network latency and/or Google servers accessibility seems to impact resources load time and wrong font may be displayed first time the web app is started, to fix this simply press F5 (refresh page) in browser.

Current settings are 4 lines for definition itself (these should be copy/pasted without changes directly from web app), Target Pace for pacemaker values (should be entered as string in <min>:<sec> format, e.g. "5:40" as in min/km) and Milestones, which are just fixed distances comma separated list, they are expressed in kilometers and may contain fractional values using dot delimiter (e.g. 0.5,1,1.5, etc). It'necessary to enter values in kilometers, but they will be converted before display depending on watch settings.

Default setup is considered to be a "component showcase" and consists of basic building blocks:
- Data values, which are simply text representation of corresponding activity information bits like time or speed, for data values it's possible to change screen coordinates, font, color, number of samples to smooth the value over specified amount of seconds and add optional outline for data to become more readable or dynamically colored on less contrast backgrounds; if text font is selected, then it's also possible to append data value with custom text, e.g. create label with value for another data block;
- Data graphs, these are just rolling data value charts, which represent one selected data value over a set period of time, minimum and maximum graph values are adjusted automatically, number of samples is calculated automatically based on width of graph area and graph bar, all of the other options are similar to data values;
- Graphics elements, these are basic graphical primitives, which allow to customize the layout, add visibility to some values etc; parameters for these elements are mostly self explanatory except for two specific elements of type Arc. These may not only serve as a static view elements, but also can be used to represent a dynamic data value in a manner of a progress bar. For this to happen you need to tick the "Variable" option and select base Data value (currently there's only a limited selection, but this may be a subject to change) accompanied by min and max initial values, these range values are indeed initial as when the underlying data value falls outside of this range, then range is adjusted automatically. For example in bundled layout this feature is used to display the progress to the next kilometer: Elapsed distance is selected as a base value, initial range is specified as 0 to 100 (in this case 100 means 1000m, as the distance values are displayed as 00.00), which means that this arc will grow from start angle to the maximum width angle as the elapsed distance increases during activity acting as a progress bar to the next kilometer. When elapsed distance will become greater than 1000 meters, then ranges will be readjusted using the same range difference as before, in this case minimum value will become 1000m while maximum one will increase to 2000m. Here's a little demo of what you can make using variable value arc (this config is created for semi-round devices, copy/paste this configuration string into import window of web app).
AGUAJA[HIWaVFAJNATXDEAODZQVELEUA[HIWaVFAODU]`DEAOEOQVEVE_A[HIWaVFAABG`[DEAOFDQWE`FHA[HIWaVFAABHGRDEAOF[QWFIFRA[HIWaVFAJNA\ODEAOGQQVFSF\A[HIWaVFAOE]CPCWAODZTMELF\A[HIWaVFAAAAAACWAPDWTMELF\ASADILDAPOE]CPFEABAVDVENQAPQAAAFDJCFACB

Selected element options can be adjusted using the properties panel to the right of the designer canvas. In addition to pixel-by-pixel adjustments, designer canvas allows to drag currently selected element. To drag data value it's not necessary to start drag at any specific point, but for graphs and graphical elements the drag point will be determined based on mouse pointer coordinates: e.g. to resize graph area or rectangle click and drag somewhere around the lower right corner, to adjust the radius of circles and direction arrow start drag outside of the outer radius, to change coordinates - click somewhere near the circle center. For the arcs it's currently possible to change start angle and arc width by activating drag-and-drop near the corresponding arc vertex. Touch support for mobile devices is implemented.

There are still some limitations like direction arrow points only to north or some data values available only on high-end devices like power are not yet implemented etc, but as I already mentioned above, this app is subject to improve especially for the newer devices, where there's a lot of memory available even for the data field type of app. The web app is also meant to be improved especially in a direction to provide the nearest possible WYSIWYG snapshot of what you'll actually see on device, but there are also some limitations like, for example, font, which is used as numeric font in the latest Fenix5/FR935 models is not and won't be publicly available (confirmed by Garmin officials explicitly) and I used nearest lookalike, therefore there still may be some couple of pixel differences here and there between device and web app. For these kinds of problems I can only test and fix using the user-provided layouts in specific device simulator as I'm a simple FR230 owner for real testing and I'm afraid this won't change in the nearest year unless generous users will help me to upgrade.

Web app may eventually become mobile application based on the user feedback (but not for the Apple devices, Android only).
  • This is awesome!

    Do you have any plans to make it possible to do simple calculations involving multiple data values and constants?

    For example:
    Cadence / 2;
    500 /((cadence) x (pace in minutes))
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 8 years ago
    This is awesome!

    Do you have any plans to make it possible to do simple calculations involving multiple data values and constants?

    For example:
    Cadence / 2;
    500 /((cadence) x (pace in minutes))

    Well, this is a good one. Of course any proficient developer have created simple math parsers at least once per his career, I also did about a couple of decades ago 8))
    I have put this on todo list, but accompanied by a question mark and placed at the very end, as this will involve some conceptual changes watch side and will be available only for current generation watches (meaning the ones with 26kb per data field). This is a formidable development challenge especially for a device with very limited resources, therefore I can't promise anything.
  • This is a formidable development challenge especially for a device with very limited resources,.

    Whereas your app provides great possibilities for rendering existing data values, my suggestion might be better served by a different application that provided the possibility to display only a single data value with rendering controlled by the watch (as with the built-in data fields) but with the capability to handle calculations involving multiple input sources, and possibly access to the settings and profile. Then resources would then be less of an issue, but the limit on no. of CIQ data fields per app would come into play. On that basis, though, a combination of your current app and this proposal might meet most needs without running into resource issues.
  • Can you, please, remove data field completely via Express, replace it with the debug info version (unpack prg file from attachment) and then send me contents of /GARMIN/APPS/LOGS/CIQ_LOG.txt, which will contain crash info with the default layout?


    Hi, for some reason I didn't get notification that you replied...so sorry, I didn't see this.

    Anyway, i installed the 0.23 update this morning, and it works on 935! Well the default layout does. Now to try my own layout!!
  • Would it be possible to add some lap data fields, mostly "lap pace" and "lap distance" would be great!
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 8 years ago
    Would it be possible to add some lap data fields, mostly "lap pace" and "lap distance" would be great!

    As I already ran out of memory on the older devices including my old trusty FR230, it's about time to make a source branch for the 26kb per data field watches. Lap fields are the first on my list for this change.
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 8 years ago
    As I already ran out of memory on the older devices including my old trusty FR230, it's about time to make a source branch for the 26kb per data field watches. Lap fields are the first on my list for this change.


    Thank you for the 5S version. I've only had a brief play so far but the basics seem to work really well. Excellent work.

    I need to get a better understanding of the dynamic colour that shows for HR as it didn't seem to coincide with my personal zones. Is it coded with a preset range or should it mimic my hr zones on my profile? I have only run with it once so I couldn't be sure either way.

    Thanks again
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 8 years ago
    I need to get a better understanding of the dynamic colour that shows for HR as it didn't seem to coincide with my personal zones. Is it coded with a preset range or should it mimic my hr zones on my profile? I have only run with it once so I couldn't be sure either way.

    Currently HR zone colors are hard-coded in the web/watch app to match the Garmin colors, but zone range values are checked at run time with user profile definition for "Running" sport type. You may want to check your heart rate zones definitions both on watch and in Garmin Connect to make sure these values are matching.
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 8 years ago
    Currently HR zone colors are hard-coded in the web/watch app to match the Garmin colors, but zone range values are checked at run time with user profile definition for "Running" sport type. You may want to check your heart rate zones definitions both on watch and in Garmin Connect to make sure these values are matching.


    Having gone for another run I've realised that it was the colour used for Z1 that initially confused me. This shows Z1 as yellow/orange whereas I associate that colour with Z4. Later on in the run I saw a similar colour when I was actually running in Z4 and thought that the zones were not aligned to mine. They actually are, it was just similar colours for two different zones that misled me.

    Should Z1 be grey as per garmin connect? The datafield uses grey for below Z1 but then switches to the yellow before then matching Garmin colours again. It would be great if it could show grey for below Z1 and also for Z1.

    One other thing I noticed - I put 'pacemaker target pace' on the field but this showed 0.00 for the whole run. Should this have matched the value I put in the app settings? I followed the format that was in there by default. The 'pacemaker time' field seemed to work fine as it was showing time ahead/behind the target time.
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 8 years ago
    Having gone for another run I've realised that it was the colour used for Z1 that initially confused me. This shows Z1 as yellow/orange whereas I associate that colour with Z4. Later on in the run I saw a similar colour when I was actually running in Z4 and thought that the zones were not aligned to mine. They actually are, it was just similar colours for two different zones that misled me.

    Should Z1 be grey as per garmin connect? The datafield uses grey for below Z1 but then switches to the yellow before then matching Garmin colours again. It would be great if it could show grey for below Z1 and also for Z1.

    One other thing I noticed - I put 'pacemaker target pace' on the field but this showed 0.00 for the whole run. Should this have matched the value I put in the app settings? I followed the format that was in there by default. The 'pacemaker time' field seemed to work fine as it was showing time ahead/behind the target time.

    My bad, I used grey before zone 1 indeed, now it'll be grey for before and within zone 1, found pacemaker target pace bug also, thanks.