Apologies if this seems like it's in the wrong category, but my question is not about FIT protocol, rather about which speed from a FIT file is representing what.
I see that in the FIT files, there is a record speed labelled enhanced, and also a GPS metadata speed labeled also as enhanced.
the issue is the GPS metadata appeares to be modified ( it's smoothed and generally lags in change ) compared with the Record speed.
Occasionally I see what I think looks like errors with the GPS metadata, particularly after a speed increase where it plataus or reduces
The Record speed looks as if it is more raw, but I can see a lot of variation in that, almost like it's using altimeter or accelerometer which creates noise for my purposes.
The Carming connect speed, is different yet again, but appears like a filtered record speed.
Anyone have anyidea at all which of these speeds are 2D instead of 3D, or which do not use the accelerometers?
GCM top, orange = record, blue = gps metadata