Forerunner 735XT

It is essentially the same as the 235 You should be able to use the fr235 profile to test in the simulator for now. You shouldn't have to wait long though.

Travis

1272

It is essentially the same as the 235 You should be able to use the fr235 profile to test in the simulator for now. You shouldn't have to wait long though.

Travis

That doesn't explain how some watch faces are showing that they support the 735 on the app store already?! The supported list is something generated from the build process. So have these select few developers been given earlier versions to be able to get the jump on the rest of us?!

How come the no 1 watch face shows it support the 735?

Come on Garmin, play fair!

That doesn't explain how some watch faces are showing that they support the 735 on the app store already?!

I answered the question you asked, and now you're changing the question.

So have these select few developers been given earlier versions to be able to get the jump on the rest of us?!

As with any product, I think it is safe to assume that there are people testing these things well before being released to the public.

Travis

That doesn't explain how some watch faces are showing that they support the 735 on the app store already?! The supported list is something generated from the build process. So have these select few developers been given earlier versions to be able to get the jump on the rest of us?!

How come the no 1 watch face shows it support the 735?

Come on Garmin, play fair!

It is because ActiFace was compiled with the latest CIQ 1.2.6 and supports FR235, so Garmin auto-migrated it for the 735, which is from CIQ point of view similar. There are lot of other apps which were auto-migrated for 735.