In the latest software update the 'improved fitness age' is introduced. After 2 weeks of use, I am already on my achievable fitness age. Question: is it correct that it's limited on 'age minus 9 years' ? If so, why a limiter ?
In the latest software update the 'improved fitness age' is introduced. After 2 weeks of use, I am already on my achievable fitness age. Question: is it correct that it's limited on 'age minus 9 years' ? If so, why a limiter ?
So, it seems to be true. There is limiter at 'age minus 10'. Not very motivating. It would be good for Garmin (or Firstbeat ?) to 1. state this somewhere and 2. explain why a limiter has been set and 3…
You may be surprised but for the most part I agree with you. All gimmicks and you shouldn't take them too seriously. On the other hand, why buy a 945, when you are not interest al all in these gimmicks…
You really are a troll, comes with age probably ? Never was it stated as a fact: "It seems to be true". We will see if Garmin/Firstbeat is going to give additional explanation on the new metric. Up to…
There is limiter at 'age minus 10'. Not very motivating.
There's been no evidence presented to suggest this is the case other than a perception? If anybody is really interested do some research to find out how it is calculated. Ask Garmin. Ask Firstbeat.
There are no favors done when people complain about a result without understanding it, just because they disagree with it.
I am trying to find out, no ?
Really with posts like this?
It would be good for Garmin (or Firstbeat ?) to 1. state this somewhere and 2. explain why a limiter has been set and 3. why on 'age minus 10'
The implication, even allowing for translation, is that there is a belief that it is true.
Enough said. Nobody has been able to verify or contradict the statement hence my suggestion to approach FirstBeat or Garmin and find out how the Fitness Age is determined.
Try searching with 'Fitness Age?'