After the uproar of F5+ owners not getting features included in the 945, it’s time to ask whether the 945 will get the new F6 features/screens:
After the uproar of F5+ owners not getting features included in the 945, it’s time to ask whether the 945 will get the new F6 features/screens:
Ray said on Twitter:
The Forerunner 245/245M/945 will all get PacePro. The FR945 will also get widget glances and map themes (including popularity/heatmaps). TBD/TBA for the FR945 on getting power/battery…
PacePro, Widget glances, new ClimbPro gradient, Map Themes, 6 data fields per page are all confirmed for FR945 this fall at latest.
I would like 6 data on one page as on screens with F6 on my FR945. I know i can use custom CIQ field but still i have more trust for build in fields (not to crash) and i assume battery would be better…
BTW Do you think OHR when swimming will never goes to official firmware in FR945?
In my opinion, it wouldn´t be fair to 945 or 245 users, being the "lab rats" in order to testing this feature for F6, and then take it away. I don´t think that will happen. At least, I hope so.
BTW Do you think OHR when swimming will never goes to official firmware in FR945?
Sure, I remember Garmin Blake wrote this somewhere when being asked why swimming OHR got dropped from 2.70. Recall: "needs some more beta testing and will be added in a later firmware release".
Ray said on Twitter:
The Forerunner 245/245M/945 will all get PacePro. The FR945 will also get widget glances and map themes (including popularity/heatmaps). TBD/TBA for the FR945 on getting power/battery modes and other newer features. MARQ series will get everything.
and dcrainmaker.com added this via Twitter today
And a bit more updates. The FR945 will get update to 6 data fields per page, and new ClimbPro gradient coloring. For all new battery modes/manager features, they're TBD on that, maybe/maybe not. The FR245 will get swim optical HR (FR945 has already in beta). This fall at latest.
Comically small. I guess I'm coming from a perspective of trail running where the hills are significant. For example, PacePro only drops an average pace by 4min/mile for a 900+ foot hill mile. But it's a neat concept and for sure would be helpful in racing road half marathons and up.