This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

V19.18: Fix persistent notification vibration for incoming calls; No Thanks

I liked the persistent vibration. It meant I never missed a phone call. I presume there is no option to keep a function that existed since I bought the watch 2 years ago.

Top Replies

Garmin-Sierra 5 months ago +18 verified

We are tracking the feedback from this change. If anyone preferred the continual vibrations for phone calls, please comment below with permission for me to add you to our report!
Garmin-Sierra 2 months ago +4 verified

All,

This has been addressed on sw version 20.26 which is currently at 20%. Thank you very much for your feedback!
Garmin-Sierra 2 months ago in reply to d48d1cdf6e4043329892578c1b4481a4 +1 verified

All,

I am very sorry to those who are disappointed with how we addressed this concern. The number of vibrations has been extended, but unfortunately we cannot please everyone's desire on how long the vibrations…
SZAMigabi 5 months ago in reply to Garmin-Sierra +4

Dear Sierra!

I think the best solution would be for everyone to be able to choose whether they prefer a short vibration or a continuous vibration.

Edit:

@Garmin-Sierra Is it not possible to post a vote…
3358393 5 months ago +4

Garmin Guys??? I’m a garmin lover for decades, but it looks like you try to kill your business… Such changes pushing me to another brands… Fix it ASAP please

and shortcuts - any news…

All Replies

0 NICK 5 months ago in reply to Garmin-Sierra

I prefer the continuous vibrations for calls.

0 4684381 5 months ago in reply to 3738778

3738778 said:
not even the GPS can be propagated under water... Yet the open water swimming function exists.

Bluetooth is not GPS, it establishes a bidirectional connection, which requires overhead (time, battery, processor). This is different from simply receiving a signal from a pre-selected satellite. Then think for yourself whether they are worth twitching when the connection is lost/restored while swimming or not.

0 NICK 5 months ago in reply to 4684381

it was like that previously, so I don't think we should worry about performance.

When I am swimming, I do not ecpect phine calls, but when I am cycling or hikking, yes I want notification

0 4684381 5 months ago in reply to NICK

NICK said:
it was like that previously, so I don't think we should worry about performance.

This is not a matter of thought, but of competent engineering calculation; in my opinion, productivity should always be taken care of.

NICK said:
When I am swimming, I do not ecpect phine calls, but when I am cycling or hikking, yes I want notification

I was only talking about water.

0 RichakaRichard 5 months ago in reply to Garmin-Sierra

Please add me to report.

There are have been lots of requests on the forums for continuous vibration for calls. In the following posts has links to a lot of other related threads https://forums.garmin.com/outdoor-recreation/outdoor-recreation/f/fenix-7-series/319809/vibration-duration-for-call-notifications

In the last month I came across a post on Reddit asking from a prospective buyer, if the 255 had continuous vibration for calls.

Hopefully at least the option can return. Thanks

0 5512147 5 months ago in reply to Anthony

I agree. Optional choice will be great

0 kurtie_bcn 5 months ago in reply to Garmin-Sierra

I also preferred the continual vibrations. Add me to your report, please.

0 Jeffrey 5 months ago in reply to Garmin-Sierra

Preferred the old way, and take this new lock screen vibration away too.

0 MadsHK 5 months ago in reply to Garmin-Sierra

The new way is in no way intense enough. The old made way more sense.

0 Pavel_T 5 months ago in reply to Garmin-Sierra

I prefer the continuous vibrations for calls.