MoveIQ seem to just register that an activity is done, not register the training load from it.
Of course, the estimation will be less accurate as OHR is just strobing, not continuously on, no GPS etc. It should still be sufficient for a base estimation.
I would prefer to not manually track by commuting bike rides (2*7km a day, some in zone 2). I am not interested in that data myself, it is just a minor hassle to record the rides.
If I do not record the rides, the 255 constantly recommends more easy exercises, not the anaerobic it should recommend. It is quite irritating, Garmin has the relevant data but do not use it.
But all analysis other than the quite good GPS is maybe meaningless anyway? Should we expect this data to be useful?
* Sleeptracking is a joke.
* OHR is very unreliable and do not detect zone 5 for me or detect peaks higher than my max hr and readjusts the HR zones (I have deactivated that now). This lack of accuracy is another reason to why training load analysis is quite meaningless.
How can I trust data I cannot measure myself as HRV etc?