This is basically a rant. Garmin launched Vivoactive 6 yesterday, at 299$ and the Venu 3 is less than 2 years old now.
Having said that, the Vivoactive 6 has more features than Venu 3, despite being 150$ less. This looks like a slap on the face of every Venu 3 user.
For many months we have been requesting Garmin to add Courses feature to Venu 3 and now Vivoactive 6 has Courses and Pace Pro feature? WTH IS GARMIN DOING BY PLAYING WIHT VENU 3 USERS??
If Venu 3 will get all those features in the upcoming update, it could be even, if not, this might probably be my last Garmin watch.
Been a Garmin user since 2017 and maybe its time to switch. 450$ is not small money and Garmin should realize that. Garmin seems to lure many people by introducing features to its new Vivoactive 6 watch, but doing that by ignoring the more premium Venu 3 is outright stupidity.
-
A disappointed Garmin customer