This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

My 1050 battery life is actually beating that of my 1040!

I mount my 1050 on the out front mount, and carry my 1040 (non-solar) in my pocket. The 1040 is always in battery save mode, and the 1050 has battery save mode disabled. I connect both units to my Windows desktop after each ride and copy the ride files to my hard drive.  I have been using the cables that came with the respective units.

The 1040 is connected using a USB-A port and the 1050 uses the USB-C port on the front panel of my desktop computer.  The 1040 goes into storage device mode pretty quickly - I copy the ride file and remove the unit from my computer.  The battery level usually does not increase.  The 1050 seems to take a lot longer time to go into storage device mode, and meanwhile, the USB-C port is giving it a few percentage point boost in battery life. Some days, the 1050 ends up with a higher battery level than it showed before my ride.

The past week or so, I have been using the 1050's cable for both units.  The 1040 still changes to a storage device more quickly, so even if it's getting charged more quickly than with the USB-A to USB-C cable, it doesn't increase the battery charge level very much.

I fully charged both units in late October and have ridden over 53 hours since.  The 1040 is at 48% and the 1050 is at 51%.

Until I go on a 24 hour ride using navigation the entire time (which won't be in this lifetime), I'm going to be OK with the 1050's battery life.

  • The only time my 1040 solar beat the 1050 in battery life is in direct sun with auto brightness dimming the 1040solar screen to no backlight. In that use case, it could probably have run forever. The 1050 battery life is outstanding.