Such a cool feature if they can get it right (predictive climbs) but the graphics are just off. See attached for an example. It's consistently very different from the actual (the number gradient always seems pretty close)
Such a cool feature if they can get it right (predictive climbs) but the graphics are just off. See attached for an example. It's consistently very different from the actual (the number gradient always seems pretty close)
Agreed - I find exactly this, too.
I've only been using my 1040 for just over a month, and have so far only ridden (very small!) local hills, but as it stands the graphic has been sufficiently inaccurate…
Last weekend I was climbing something around a 20% grade and it said I was going downhill lol.
I should say that when it's actually following a course I've loaded, it's MUCH better. But every single time it predicts a climb it will be very off.
