This problem was allready reported in the beta version by different users.
The scale should be 14443 m or 14.4 km
Fenix 6X Sapphire
This problem was allready reported in the beta version by different users.
The scale should be 14443 m or 14.4 km
Fenix 6X Sapphire
Why ? Isn't that obvious. They don't care. There can not be any other explanation.
Please be nice in our forums. If you personally knew the engineers, saw the hours they work, and…
The issue is resolved with the v25.00 software update.
https://forums.garmin.com/members/af7e41af518b479984b3757ab539b01f
You seem to be a good guy, anyway, G-Chris. It is not your fault what the general outcome of all these issues are.
And frankly speaking…
Yo tengo el mismo problema
Hi Garmin - Chris same here.
BL
It's noted. I suspect I'm just saying what many users are thinking. Otherwise eezytiger sums it all up very well.
That is, this is not the problem of engineers, but cost optimization by Garmin.
If they work overtime, they have too much work, there are too few of them if they make such a mistake.
I sympathize, but about the Scal 2 problem, I'm still mad at you guys
If you change the language file from nm to m, does it work around and temporarily resolve the issue?
Hey, maybe Garmin can try themself ?
\\Annexe - Language\4.30\french.ln4 (3 hits)
Line 1112: 9412ae5f nm (new value/line in 4.30)
Line 8440: cbe0ea76 nm
Line 8441: 49c967f8 nm
\\\Annexe - Language\Old\4.20\french.ln4 (2 hits)
Line 8419: cbe0ea76 nm
Line 8420: 49c967f8 nm
\\\Annexe - Language\Old\4.10\french.ln4 (2 hits)
Line 8227: cbe0ea76 nm
Line 8228: 49c967f8 nm
\\\Annexe - Language\Old\4.00\french.ln4 (2 hits)
Line 8203: cbe0ea76 nm
Line 8204: 49c967f8 nm
I don't doubt that the developers/engineers are doing their best. But how much time do they spend on the Fenix 6 series compared to the newer products? I'm guessing now, but I think that the best and most experienced developers is working with the newest/coming products which leaves old products to the newer and most unexperienced developers. Thats very common in this business.
Anyway, "nm" probably stands for "Nautical Mile" so I'm guessing that it's the language reference in the code which is wrong and not the language file. It should be "m" or use "km" / "mi" instead (depending on device settings). The value also needs to be converted correctly then.
AndersB, it could but normally nautical miles should be capital letter (source wikipedia). As you state, this is not probably as simple as find and replace
M is used as the abbreviation for the nautical mile by the International Hydrographic Organization. NM is used by the International Civil Aviation Organization.