DEM Calibration and GPS Inaccuracy

Hello everyone,

During today’s hike, I calibrated the barometer before starting the activity. Using DEM, the calibration was completely inaccurate, showing at least 100m less altitude than the actual value. With GPS, the situation improved, but there was still a 20m discrepancy below the actual altitude.

Interestingly, before the calibration, the altitude reading was closer to the correct value for the area where I was. Additionally, it seemed that the GPS tracking was less accurate. I was precisely in the center of the trail, yet the track sometimes placed me slightly to the right or left. It’s a minor issue, but this never happened with my Fenix 7X Solar, where the tracking was precise, and DEM calibration worked perfectly.

At this point, I’d like to understand something: are Garmin’s DEM data inaccurate, or is this an issue with the firmware update affecting the sensors’ precision?

The location where I was had an actual altitude of 1,360 meters. DEM calibration gave me 1,290 meters, while GPS calibration provided 1,340 meters.

For someone engaging in outdoor activities, having accurate data is essential. DEM data, in particular, should be precise as they are preloaded into the watch along with Garmin maps. Previously, they seemed reliable, but if the data is as inaccurate as it is now, I wonder if there’s any point in keeping them.

Over these weeks of use, DEM calibration has consistently proven to be useless. Either the data is entirely incorrect, or the GPS isn’t accurately detecting my position.

I look forward to your feedback.

  • Digital Elevation Models can't be accurate in hilly areas. It's a grid of the world, scanned by various methods (for example with lasers from satellites). The real world is "spiky" but the DEM data cannot measure every tiny bump and pebble on the ground. So no, it cannot be "precise". The grid can be much as 1 elevation point for a 2x2km area, for example. I don't know what resolution the watch use, but this is just a general argument, that having very accurate elevation is a LOT of data to store when going for a finer grid.

    If you're standing on a mountain top that's like a sharp point in an otherwise lower elevation area, which this data cannot account for well.

    So DEM is useful when the elevation is not too different in the large area around, which is rarely the case when you want accurate elevation. So in most cases it's better to use GPS calibration where it can see a lot of satellites, thus having a relatively good vertical elevation estimate.

    Best is manual calibration if you know the exact elevation where you are. Of course if the pressure changes during the day then the elevation will also drift away from the reality. It's not easy to measure elevation accurately. Slight smile

  • Thank you for your response, even though I was already familiar with how the DEM works, as I deal with trail mapping and digital cartography. In any case, a 100-meter difference in altitude based on DEM calibration seems completely off the scale to me.

  • Oh so you were at a very big and evenly flat area (over 1 or 2 square kilometers) at 1360 meters, like a mesa or a plateau?