Wondering if the new solar technology is as Garmin state. Anybody tested yet? The last solar technology was basically useless i.e. hours and hours of full sun for one percent gain if that.
Wondering if the new solar technology is as Garmin state. Anybody tested yet? The last solar technology was basically useless i.e. hours and hours of full sun for one percent gain if that.
It's a bit early to say for me. I think it is useful?
I wish there was clearer information about how much battery is gained through solar. The Edge 1040 Solar tells you are every ride how much time…
Before I returned mine, I had it sitting on the lawn chair in the backyard for just over 2 hours(I figured why not). This is AZ, full sun, middle of the day and it never moved/gained a percent. It didn…
I think the watch has a lot of potential, but I could not wrap my head around paying 972$ after taxes for a watch with so many little issues. I think software updates will fix most things, but I'm not…
I did a test by exposing the watch for a few hours behind my window with the September sun, so not as strong as in the middle of summer, which allows the watch to heat up less during the test.
And I confirm that at around 100klux/h I had an increment of 1%, I was able to reach a maximum of 150klux/h but I did not have the increment of a 2nd percent because the time became cloudy.
So regarding the operation of the solar panel itself, with the sun in the morning from 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. approximately 10:30 a.m., the speed of increase in klux/h was similar to the enduro 2, on the other hand when the sun was powerful enough, the speed of increase in klux/h became faster.
So I think that depending on where you are (me being from STRASBOURG), if you are outside further south and with a powerful sun it is possible to "charge" the watch and really have unlimited, in mode eco or classic ABC watch, i.e. without bluetooth, wifi, or heart rate sensor...
Last point: as everyone knows, Garmin released what could be the best watch, but buggy as ever, and I noticed that even in energy saving mode, it consumes more than what the enduro consumed 2 or even instinct 2x solar.
This time I'm not going to return the watch because that would be a shame, but I hope that Garmin will quickly release a corrective update for all these problems. And there we will be able to even better test the real efficiency of the real recharge potential.
Thanks for the update.. what were the conditions for your watch during this test?
Was it turned on?
If it was on, was it in Smartwatch Mode / linked with a phone or on battery saver mode?
Was wifi on/off?
What watch face were you using?
yes the watch was on, not in power saving mode, all connections and sensors: bluetooth, wifi, heart rate sensor and oximeter disabled, basically a classic ABC watch.
The dial is the original one from the enduro 3 with modified data fields: altitude, barometer, sunrise and sunset times, date.
The conditions were those of early September and behind a window, from around 8 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., the sun was therefore present, but not as strong as it was in midsummer, which allowed me to see that the panel exploiting its full potential when the sun was already high and quite strong all the same, after 10:30 a.m.
And for the percentage increment, it increased without restarting the watch as was sometimes necessary on the enduro 2.
Which therefore makes me think, as already stated, that Garmin has probably planned for the sun to recharge and therefore increase the percentages.
Let's wait and see what it will be like after a next update which I hope will improve the stability and consumption of the enduro 3.
Really useful and good to know, thanks for the share.
Hopefully this indicates that with decent prolonged exposure to direct strong sunlight (which should give even more lux hours than yours got behind a window), we should see some good results to keep the battery maximised and even achieve solar charging if needed (e.g. spending an extended time away from a charger)
Wondering how many are going to use screen protectors and what effect that will have if any on solar? Not that we'll get much boost in the UK now till spring
I'm not planning on using a screen protector on mine personally, I never have on any of my watches
I''m also in the UK. I can't see a screen protector helping to capture our almost non existent solar rays over the next 6 months.... I guess if the protector is the same as the actual watch face it won't cover the solar panel, but it might look odd?
Well I tried a little experiment with mine.
I fully charged it Sunday midday, and left it for 20 mins once it reached 100% to ensure it had FULLY charged.
Took it off the mains charger at 12:15 Sunday.
By 12:15 today it was showing 98% battery and 37 days.
I spent the afternoon at work outside in decent sunny conditions (for the UK in September at least) and it registered 33.7K lux hours collected.
I have just noticed that my expected battery is now 38 days and it has increased back up to 100% battery, which I really wasn't expecting!!
Before fully charging I switched to a Garmin stock watchface without seconds or heart rate showing. I've also switched from having it turn on backlight on touch/ button press "after sunset" (which doesn't seem to work as it lights up all day) to having them off.
The above was without any GPS activity tracking, backlight on 20%, wifi off, Bluetooth paired to phone with notifications coming through.
Ah, it’s not bad at all!
which more or less confirms my thoughts following my tests, which for my part were behind a window
I noticed when I was in direct sunlight for a few minutes that the klux/h increased much more quickly.
On the other hand, you say that you emaganized 33.7klux/h, wouldn't it be more like 337klux/h?
Because according to my findings, the watch needs approximately more or less 100klux/h to have an increment of 1%
With the enduro 3 my maximum was 145klux/h from memory, but with the enduro 2 I had already reached 300klux/h but there I did not have 2% more battery especially than the enduro 2 didn't know how to increment the additional % without restarting.
It is definitely 33.7K (it is now up to 34.1k). I had the Fenix 7X solar before so I'm used to seeing Lux Hours. After a 9 hour summer hike last year mostly in full sun my 7X reached 240K.
I didn't spend anywhere near enough time in direct sun to get 300K+. 34K seems about right and at a guess my old 7X would have only been on around 15-20K with similar exposure.
The increase in battery % really confused me, but if that is the reality of decent, direct sun exposure I'm VERY happy! I'll keep an wire over the next few days and see what happens