Large discrepancy in Calorie Calculation between Forerunner 965 and Descent G1
Forerunner 965
Pool Swim
1300 m
51:43 min
3:55 /100m
117 ave hr
422 calories
Descent G1 Solar
Pool Swim
1300 m
50:58 min
3:55 /100m
127 ave hr
208 Calories
Similar times, same distance, but even though my Ave HR was higher with the Descent G1 swim it was less than have the calories burned than with the FR 965.
Seems odd ?
The HR Zones are pretty close between watches.
FR 965
Descent G1
Are the physiological data (weight, maxhr, etc.) the same in both?
HR Zones look pretty close, although I thought this would be kept in sync with Physio True Up ?
Fr 965
Descent G1
Are these the stats you mean ?
FR965
Decent G1
Maybe its because the FR965 is set as my Primary wearable and Training device and is the one I wear most of the time.
I switch to the Descent G1 when the FR965 is on charge or for Diving.
These are the settings I have
FR965
Decent G1
Maybe its because the FR965 is set as my Primary wearable and Training device and is the one I wear most of the time, thus its the one directly reading HRV, etc.
I switch to the Descent G1 when the FR965 is on charge or for Diving.
Maybe I just swam differently when I used the G1, seems too difficult to tell.
