From day 1 I thought the same thing. The marq athlete watch face should have customizable data fields. Heart rate is certainly an extra drain, to what extent I have no idea. I’m running a digital face…
Just did a 1 hour 22 minute run without music which dropped the battery 5-6%, whereas a 1 hour run with music uses at least 10%.
Tested this yesterday/today.
Looking back, I'm averaging a charge every three days. I typically do about 6 activities of some kind a day, 4 with GPS.
Pretty happy with that.
Pulse OFF, did exactly one hour run with GPS+Glonass, external HR connected and 2 CIQ apps installled in the Run app. Battery consumption 10%! Which leads to the logical conclusion that I can do about 10hours with a full charge! Not quite good Garmin, right? I hope you are working hard on a FW update to make better of the battery usage.
I am aware of the issues with battery usage outside GPS usage and I can live with that, but during an exercise ... So looking fwd for an update.
Current battery consumption with the stock digital watch face + 1h30m cycling with HRM and GPS.
Pretty satisfied with the battery life with the digital watch face. The Marq watch face is another story though
Now, if the digital watch face could show the bezel indicators I would be over the moon.
I am on beta 3.34 - charged to 100% 2 days and 12 hours ago. Went for 2 runs with GPS totalling 3 hours. O2 sensors is off. So, now after latest run the watch takes 1% battery /hour and I have only 31% left... After not even 3 days. So Garmin, you have to do much better than this!