I'm thinking about purchasing a vivoactive 3 ? (over a fitbit ionic). The swim feature is important to me. I'm in the UK, so some features are not (yet) available and there are not many options on screen protectors for the VA3M, at least at a reasonable price!
Obviously I know having music on the 3M is the draw, but otherwise how do the two versions compare?
There seems to be a few differences, like the glass on the screen. The VA3 seems more physically robust than the VA3M? (from what I've read). This concerns me about the VA3M. I don't think I am a rough user, but watches do get knocked about....
But there is more storage on the VA3M, for apps? (Not sure if this is a biggie, though more space may future-proof it a little longer)
Are some of the sensors in different places?
Is accuracy for some readings better on one than the other?
Slightly different software?
Anyway, just wondering whether the extra £40 is worth it! Actually, whether I'd just be better considering the VA3.
Thanks for your advice.
(These are pretty much at the upper range of my price limit and I don't have the money to buy a new one willy-nilly unfortunately, so I really want to make the best decision on this - yes, I know these are not perfect but neither is the fitbit ionic but hopefully they will be sufficient for me for a good while).
x-posted in the vivoactive 3 forum.