This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Would you buy a 735XT again?

Former Member
Former Member
I recently lost my old Garmin and purchased another brands fitness tracker (top of the line for the company) on a whim walking through a store. One week in and I have to delete the tracker from my iPhone every few days to get it to sync and hate that it counts doing crunches, the typical crunch movement over a fitness ball, as a step. I understand we have to be patient with technology but at this point I have very little patience with technology such as fitness trackers, cell phones, ect that unless physically broken, I believe should just work. Yea - I'm a grumpy old 50 year old.

I have three simple needs; acurate step counting, accurate GPS for trail running, and the ability to tell the tracker when I'm running vs cycling which I believe the 735XT shouldcover easily. Knowing what you all know, would you buy another 735XT tomorrow if you lost yours tonight?

Thanks for any thoughts/comments.
  • I've been using my FR735XT for 18 months. If I lost it today, I'd rather go for the 935.

    Now some comments to your requirements:

    acurate step counting


    This one is the trickiest. The 735XT will count steps quite accurately, but certain conditions have to be met. Step counting is a very simple technology and is prone to false positives and negatives in many circumstances. The bottom line is that for some people it is acceptable, and for others it isn't.

    the ability to tell the tracker when I'm running vs cycling


    I'm not sure I understand this one. You can start a running activity on the watch and you can start a cycling activity. But if you don't start your activities manually, then the watch won't know what you're doing. Another limitation is that no matter what activity you are doing, step count is not inhibited, which can result in counting steps when cycling or swimming.

    accurate GPS for trail running


    As a dedicated trail runner I can say that I never experienced any GPS accuracy issues. There are however two limitations that make the FR735XT less optimal for trail running than some alternative models. One of them is relatively short battery capacity and the other is lack of course elevation profile during run.
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 6 years ago
    I've been using my FR735XT for 18 months. If I lost it today, I'd rather go for the 935.

    Now some comments to your requirements:



    This one is the trickiest. The 735XT will count steps quite accurately, but certain conditions have to be met. Step counting is a very simple technology and is prone to false positives and negatives in many circumstances. The bottom line is that for some people it is acceptable, and for others it isn't.



    I'm not sure I understand this one. You can start a running activity on the watch and you can start a cycling activity. But if you don't start your activities manually, then the watch won't know what you're doing. Another limitation is that no matter what activity you are doing, step count is not inhibited, which can result in counting steps when cycling or swimming.



    As a dedicated trail runner I can say that I never experienced any GPS accuracy issues. There are however two limitations that make the FR735XT less optimal for trail running than some alternative models. One of them is relatively short battery capacity and the other is lack of course elevation profile during run.


    I'll have a look at the 935 feature set. Thanks.
  • I will consider FR 645. I think the one feature that really miss out is the lack of barometer to measure elevation.
  • I will consider FR 645. I think the one feature that really miss out is the lack of barometer to measure elevation.


    IMHO, the barometer is overrated and prone to being faulty. My friend has a Fenix 5 and has gone through 3 watches with Garmin and none of them have been accurate. I did a trail run with him last week that had 1480' of elevation change (according to the trail map). My 735XT measured 1469 and his F5 measured 1150ish. Once he ran the manual corrections on Strava it went back to the 1480ish.

  • I will consider FR 645. I think the one feature that really miss out is the lack of barometer to measure elevation.


    Owning the 910, 920, and a 935 which all have a barometer I wish Garmin would do like the 735 and just use GPS for elevation. On all the units with a barometer (a small hole in the watch,) they all go bad eventually if you swim a lot due to chlorine getting in the little hole and ruining the barometer sensor. Now most triathletes don't really swim much so not everyone has had the bad barometer problem but many have. (go to the 920 and 935 forums) and you will see. GPS elevation is close enough for most people

  • No. I dont buy again the 735xt. I had two 735xt and the left buttons fails around a year of use. Bad quality.
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 6 years ago
    Thanks all.
  • I've had mine for 25 months and it has been working like a champ - including 3 pools sets per week and a lot of open water swimming during the summer.

    It will be replaced very soon by an F5+ - if I can work with its GPS. Main reason is, that I need a CIQ3 watch for some of the Data Fields I am using and I am afraid that the 935 will be taken out of the update loop in year or so due to memory limitations. It really looks like Garmin will be going for watches with some serious memory on board.
  • I have had a 735XT since June 2017 and am very happy with it. If it failed tomorrow I would probably get a Fenix 5 instead.
  • Hi
    mine failed two days ago and I had it only since April 2017. This was right after the update and it showed the battery is super low although i am charging it. Could be update related or just dead. Waiting for support to come back. I would like to get the 645m now due to music for running and CIQ3 as well as barometer sensor and higher res screen. I would not buy a 735xt anymore. looks to sporty and old style. I do however lower the small footprint and weight.