This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

FR735XT for ultra running - race report

I don't know if it's of any interest to anyone, but I'd like to share my experience of using the FR735XT during a multi-hour ultra trail race - something the watch wasn't specifically designed for. If you're curious how it went, please read on. If not - forgive me for cluttering the forum.

A little disclaimer: English is not my native language. You may encounter some mistakes and/or strange language constructs while reading this text.

Description of the event
The race was a 102 km ultra trail race with a total ascent of 4200 m, cut-off time set at 16 h (I had an ambitious plan to finish it in less than 13 h), and ambient temperature to be expected at 15-20C.
Formerly I participated in other ultra races, none that long, however. This was my first race with the FR735XT. Formerly I used the FR310XT which performed amazingly well (superb battery life, superb screen visibility in any lighting conditions, some advanced trail features). I even considered using it for the race instead of my new FR735XT, but eventually decided against it, because the FR310XT lacks 24/7 activity tracking and I would hate to loose that step count :)
Prior to the race I've been using my FR735XT since last december for running workouts (street running mostly) and triathlon training and racing. The ultra race would be the first activity of this kind and duration that I'd do with the FR735XT.

Use case
A short explanation how I planned to use the watch during the race.
  • Registering the event for post-race analysis.
  • Position and time awareness (how far in the race I am, how far away from next check point).
  • Navigation assistance (easy to get lost on sparsely marked trail route).

Device configuration
My main concern would be battery life. The manufacturer specifies 14h, but I was aware that realistically I could not count on that. I was prepared to charge the device during the race (had a USB powerbank with me), but wanted to avoid it, if possible, and decided to configure the device in a way which would allow me to reach at least 15-16 h on a single charge, with time to spare.
So the first thing to go was optical HR. I don't need it during a race, and while it would be fun to look at the HR graph after the race, I judged that it's not worth the juice. For a short moment I considered using an external ANT+ HR strap, which would be more energy efficient, but I was affraid that even the most comfortable strap would become irritating after so many hours.
I never considered using UltraTrac. First, it's not accurate enough for me, and second, it was broken in the FR735XT (supposedly fixed with the last firmware update, but I had no chance to test it properly before the race).
An important feature for me was LiveTrack, as I wanted to keep my family aware of my position, so being aware that it was an additional strain for the battery, I decided to enable it.
The race officials provided a GPX course for the race and I had it uploaded to my watch.

So the summary of the device configuration:
  • GPS with GLONASS off, UltraTrack disabled, smart recording.
  • Optical HR off.
  • ANT+ footpod paired and connected (some other ANT+ sensors paired but not connected).
  • LiveTrack enabled (so BLE on and connected to smartphone).
  • Backlight off.
  • No custom Connect IQ data fields.
Race report
I disconnected the watch from charging about 20 minutes prior to race start. 10 minutes before start I entered activity mode, thus enabling GPS, and loaded the race course.
Now, before anything else, I have to report that I ended the race with a DNF. At 63 km and 9h10 I had to withdraw due to injury (pity, because my pace up to that point would put me in the top 15). However the time and distance covered allow me to extrapolate a little and assess the watch for long ultra running activities.
During the race the watch performed without any issues. When I stopped the timer after 9h10 I still showed about 50% of battery left, which allows me to expect the battery to last for at least the 16h cut off time, possibly a little longer.

Very subjective verdict
So....
If you're wondering if I find the FR735XT useful and practical for ultra-long trail runs, the short answer is yes. All the essential features worked as expected, the GPS accuracy (distance, pace, position) was at least satisfactory and the navigation feature helped me stay on course where I saw other competitors struggling to find the right way. One thing to note is that a significant part of the route was in a dense and tall forest which could affect GPS accuracy, but I saw no issues there.
LiveTrack worked flawlessly, according to my wife, who monitored my position regularly and at all time was aware where I was and how I was doing, sometimes better than me myself :)
The device itself is very light and comfortable, giving it a slight edge over the heavy and bulky F5 or F3 (or my old FR310XT, for that matter).
Important thing is that the watch can be relatively comfortably charged on the go. I did not have the need to do it during this race, but I tried it out several times before during other workouts and it worked without issues. One thing worth remembering, though: When charging the device, you loose optical HR, even if you still wear the watch on your wrist. This would be no issue during the race, because, as I mentioned before, I disabled OHR anyway, but it is something to be aware of.
There are however some issues worth noting (in order of importance).
  • The most important feature that I miss from my old FR310XT is the course elevation plot. This is super-useful for trail running because it tells you what kind of terrain to expect, how long the climb/descent is going to last and so on. Without it I had to rely on the elevation profile printed on my race bib, and that is neither very accurate, nor comfortable to use.
  • Getting the GPX course into the watch was a PITA.
  • Loading the course upon starting navigation takes a really long time (about 5 minutes). The ancient FR310XT is much faster in this regard.
  • Once navigating a course, 2 additional data screens are added to the data screen carrousel (ETA and virtual racer), and there is no way to disable them. This makes scrolling through data screens more time-consuming in case you don't need those additional data screens (and I don't need them).

Ok, that's all. Thank you for reading this far. I don't know if I included all important information, so feel free to ask any questions. I'll try to answer them as best as I can.
  • Regarding issue #1: there are some IQ apps and data fields for elevation plot but I personally found them next to useless. Could be a different story for you though. :)
    And issue #2: can't agree more with you. It's a PITA to the point of an actual usability. I regret I didn't make a better research on that before purchase - that was one of the core functionality I'd like to have in new gadget... As easy as drag-and-drop on Suunto for instance.
  • Regarding issue #1: there are some IQ apps and data fields for elevation plot but I personally found them next to useless. Could be a different story for you though. :)


    Well, yes, but this is not what I was referring to. I don't need an elevation plot from the device's altimeter (which incidentally is GPS-based in the FR735XT, but it was remarkably accurate during the race whenever I checked it against known altitude). This is of little use because it shows you historical and current altitude only. And I need elevation profile of upcoming terrain. I need an elevation plot from current COURSE DATA (!!!) with my current position plotted on it. AFAIK there is no way of doing it with a CIQ app, because the CIQ API gives no access to course data.
  • Thanks for that report. Sorry you had to DNF especially after making more than halfway.

    I did my first 50k this year and the F3 I was using at the time was overkill and I know that the 735 I'm using now would've handled it just fine. The elevation plot wasn't an issue for me because it was a 3 loop local race and I run that route often. But I'm planning on doing a 50 mile trail race next year where the terrain will be new to me and I can see where that could help a lot even though the race I'm looking at won't have nearly the same kind of elevation changes as yours.
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 7 years ago
    Great write up! I don't run ultras (marathons are my poison) but many of the pros and cons overlap. Love hearing about how others use their tech and what can be done.

    Bad luck on the DNF. Monster effort!
  • Thanks guys for your input.

    I kinda hoped to get my hands on the Foretrex 601 (https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/572639/pn/010-01772-00#) before the race as this looks like an alternative for the longest ultra runs (although not being a dedicated sports device), but unfortunately where I live it's still unavailable.
  • Thanks for this detailed report, sorry to hear you DNF. I plan to do very simmilar race (same distance, same elevation), and to use the same watch. Good to know before the run that the OHR is disabled during charging, I won't be panicky, and you know how you can get paranoid during the ultra. Also, I want to have it on for the rest of the race - Strava score being the only reason. Oh, vanity.
  • Good to know before the run that the OHR is disabled during charging,


    Luckily the step count still works during charging!
  • Thanks guys for your input.

    I kinda hoped to get my hands on the Foretrex 601 (https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/572639/pn/010-01772-00#) before the race as this looks like an alternative for the longest ultra runs (although not being a dedicated sports device), but unfortunately where I live it's still unavailable.


    I liked this ons too when it was announced but i guess the 735xt suffices for me now -- longest runs i do are about 10 hours

    Other alternatives for long running with good navigation are fenix5(x), the old epix and gpsmap64
  • Many thanks for your report!
    ​​​​​
    I also preferred the 735xt, is very light and comfortable and I can leave this on my wrist always.

    For the elevation precision my experience is very good also if the watch haven't barometric sensor...I think it's depends all for the GPS position and interpolation..

    I think the best (not for the price right now)next it will be the Fenix 5s, good for factor and best specs!

    Many thanks again!

    ​​​​​​
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 7 years ago
    I liked this ons too when it was announced but i guess the 735xt suffices for me now -- longest runs i do are about 10 hours

    Other alternatives for long running with good navigation are fenix5(x), the old epix and gpsmap64


    Got my 601 2 days ago: wouldn't like to run with it on my wrist for 10h+ for sure: bulky. Also no step counter. Great navigator tough.