This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Over a year later... how is the optical HR sensor in the 235?

Former Member
Former Member
I got the 235 at launch and while I found the optical HR better than Fitbit at the time it was worse than Mio or Scoche in the optical HR accuracy race. It had trouble with intervals and my plodding cadence sometimes got treated as the HR by the sensor instead of my actual HR. I decided for various reasons to sell the watch after only 2 months and left Garmin. Well, now I'm back with an order for a Fenix 5S and its 3rd generation Elevate sensor (almost flush now and records 24/7 HR every second now) and someone on another thread said the 235 (and other Garmin's that got the optical HR sensor) have made big progress in accuracy...

What say you all? How does the early 2017 version of the 235 work in regards to optical HR accuracy?
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 8 years ago
    hi,

    I bought the forerunner 235 short after release in my country (it was the end of november 2015 / beginning of december 2016?) and returned it after 2 weeks because the optical heartrate was a disaster.
    In september 2016 I did try it again and I love it now! Optical heart rate is good (comparable to the optical readings of my previous tomtom runner) so in my opinion it has improved a lot!
  • Have run over 2,600 miles since mid November, 2015 with the 235. I guess I am lucky,no real issues with the Elevate wrist HR. Garmin has updated software several times since the Watch hit the streets and those improvements seemed to have been beneficial to most folks. Have I had issues with wonky HR readings sometimes? Yes. But I have experienced those things with various HR straps over the years.
    I don't monitor HR other than while running so my experience may be limited compared to others. Nick
  • Only ever wear mine when running. Had it about 9 months and overall I'm happy. A couple of minor quibbles, can take a while for the HRM to get a lock, stop flashing, but there's a work around, go in and turn off then turn it on again and get a lock typically in 5-30 seconds.

    You used to get a notification that it's locked, same as when you've got GPS, but for some reason this was removed during a SW update!
  • Had mine since December 2015 and while it works OK on average I don't think you'd be happier with it now than you were originally. It still has cadence lock, it still loses the plot with ridiculous values (a reboot before running sometimes helps).

    The updates they made in the first part of 2016 did help but at the same time it got warmer and that helps HR optical sensors vs the cold that restricts blood flow to the wrists. Problems started again with v6.30 around October if memory serves and it wasn't that cold yet so...

    Are the various generations of the "Elevate" sensor documented anywhere or are they just passing mentions by Garmin each time they release a new generation ?
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 8 years ago
    Had mine since December 2015 and while it works OK on average I don't think you'd be happier with it now than you were originally. It still has cadence lock, it still loses the plot with ridiculous values (a reboot before running sometimes helps).

    The updates they made in the first part of 2016 did help but at the same time it got warmer and that helps HR optical sensors vs the cold that restricts blood flow to the wrists. Problems started again with v6.30 around October if memory serves and it wasn't that cold yet so...

    Are the various generations of the "Elevate" sensor documented anywhere or are they just passing mentions by Garmin each time they release a new generation ?


    Ray Maker of dcrainmaker.com says there are 3 generations of Elevate sensor although its more like a running change, I don't know Garmin has even referenced a change ever...

    1. First generation is what you saw in the 235, Vivosmart HR, Fenix 3HR and Vivoactive HR.

    2. Second generation is what you see in the 35, 735 and Chronos line, it basically uses a slightly different shape led bulbs, more round than rectangle. It's unclear why the change was made or if it effects performance. It maybe just a different supplier or cost savings etc.

    3. Third generation is what you see in the upcoming Fenix 5 and the big news here is it uses massively less battery power so Garmin will now be able to allow 24/7 storage of HR measured every 1-2 seconds instead of the crummy every 10 minutes to several hours (during non-workout times) seen on all the above listed Garmins. Hopefully the accuracy remains the same or gets better. The only other mass market company that has done 1-2 second all day recording of HR is Fitbit and their accuracy is horrible during workouts, nothing close to Garmin's Elevate although it does do ok for resting HRs.
  • Thanks for the summary, these differences do come back to mind now, we could add another cosmetic change, the fact that on the f5 the sensor is now flush with the watch and will no longer dig into your wrist. With my FR235 it looks worse than it feels, in fact it's painless. The idea I suppose was to provide better "isolation" for the sensor to operate, hopefully that won't be an issue on the f5 but as we've seen with the varying accuracy of the sensor on the FR235 some subtle differences can have a big impact...

    I must say the f5s is pretty tempting as a "do it all" ABC GPS watch in a nice form factor, I'll be keeping a close eye on the first reviews and user reports! I just wish Garmin stopped playing that mineral vs sapphire $100 game, it makes no sense, even cheap Seiko watches have sapphire crystals, the last time it was a big thing in the watch industry was...1972 when Omega launched it. A mineral glass with a nice Brotect screen protector will do just fine but that's for another forum ;-)
  • Temperatures up today (at last) from 0 celsius to 8 celsius and...the HR was pretty much perfect (had a cheststrap for comparison) for my 50' easy run (72% Max HR).
  • Did you wear two watches then? I don't believe there is a way to see HR strap data and optical data on one watch.

    CW
  • Yes I had my old FR610 on the right wrist showing Lap Pace and HR. The cheststrap was the HRM3 with the first version of the fabric strap.
  • The Wrist Monitor is NOT live 24/7

    Most of the time it's simply "filling in the blanks" between polling intervals. Note, the polling intervals are somewhat variable due to the Activity setting but every single activity does Polling. IMO for Interval Training the wrist monitor is 100% USELESS. To be useful for Interval Training you really need a continuous live trace and that means the only choice is to use a Chest Monitor which is a 100% live tracking device. If you want to see why I state this see the following link to a post I put up today. Based in this mornings experience the Polling interval for Indoor Run is somewhere in the range of 1.5 to 3 minutes, not nearly frequent enough for interval training. Saw lots of "overshoot" on the heart rate during rest intervals when the heart rate was rising while I was at a complete stop. I've also seen many cases where during a run at a steady pace for extended periods of time will have points during the run where the heart rate trace will go totally off track, either way low or way high. IMO the Optical Heart Rate monitor is only useful when you are sitting at a desk or asleep, for anything more active than that you can expect a lot of periods that are 100% fiction during a days heart rate trace.

    https://forums.garmin.com/showthread.php?369666-Junk-results-from-the-wrist-monitor