Related
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Labelling and placement of VO2 Max graph lines

S.M.R.
over 1 year ago

Look where the 60 and 61 marked lines are vs the actual graph that has a VO2 Max of 60.

Surely the graph should be up at the line marked 60, not what one would imagine is 59.5 looking at the markings.

  • 0 over 1 year ago

    I think the 60 label on the right is meant to be lined up with the middle of the 60 range. In other words, the “60” shown on screen is actually at 60.5. The line below the 60 is actually 60 and the line above is 61. 

    I agree that it’s an odd design choice. 

  • 0 over 1 year ago in reply to jambongris

    Could be but looking at a few of the other graphs (steps, floors climbed, body battery as examples) the more solid (or brighter in fact) of the lines seems to line up with the whole number so it may be an error in placement of  the graph line itself , but it is strange for sure .

  • 0 over 1 year ago

    I have worked it out. The actual VO2 max at two decimals is around 59.4 but it rounds up whiole number to 60. So the graph and labeling are correct . Wish they’d show two decimals though as that is what one can find from .fit files in Runalyze.

  • 0 over 1 year ago

    Is this with the new beta software?

  • 0 over 1 year ago in reply to StefanScheddy

    Yes but it was probably the same before . I think it is correct if one has the further decimal figure . The large number reflected is rounded up to nearest full digit so the graph reflects about 59.4 which is the last VO2 per fit file record .