This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

IMPOSSIBLE to train under zone 2. HELP!!

Someone PLEASE shed some light on why I cannot figure out how to improve my Base/zone 2 trainings. 

Why would the watch consider a run like this with 79% of max HR as BASE and then today's run which was average 75% of max HR categorized as TEMPO . Even ran at a much slower pace to keep HR at 150 zone. This is truly perplexing. 

HOW THE HECK CAN I TRAIN IN ZONE 2!!!! Any help is appreciated. Been super frustrated with this for months.

  • I'm gonna guess it's because the 10k "tempo" run was 1 hour, but the 6k "base" run was 30 minutes. To determine the impact of a run, I think Garmin isn't just looking at the intensity of your runs, but the amount of time spent at a given intensity (and how that intensity varies -- e.g. for intervals).

    It might suggest that your longer runs need to be even slower, so you can build endurance. Or maybe you need to run more weekly mileage.

    As a counter-example, if you ran for 1 km at the same average HR as the 6k run, you'd probably get "no benefit" for your training effect..

    I agree that sometimes training effect seems counter-intuitive. Like when I do slower runs of 20-34 km, they're often labelled as "tempo" even though I wouldn't call them tempo runs at all, based on my speed and perceived effort.

  • Your HR zones look a bit odd. Especially zone 3. It is 164-165 or 168-169. That makes your zone 3 practically non existent. Why did your zones change between the screenshots?

    Your zone 2 also goes really high. What is your max heart rate?

  • Exactly. Not very realistic. and the Max hf is rahter high i suppose,

  • Did you ever do a max. heart rate test ?

    and did you use the calulation of the zones by garmin ?

    And do you wear a Strap ?

    And what did you chose. Scales based max Hf rate or lactate ?

  • Thanks for the replies guys, appreciate any help really.
    My max is 197 bpm , resting is 44bpm

    I use HRM pro 

    I have now switched to % of Reserve method. Hopefully the zones are better suited. 

    Alternatively this is % of Lactic threshold method. 


    Let me know which one looks more realistic to you guys.

  • Lactate is better.

    But still is your max hf realistic. You must be pretty young thow.

    The % of zones is ok now

  • Through various past runs I've gotten the HRM pro strap to auto detect my Lactate at 180bpm but I feel I need to get some really good recovery (2 days or so) and do a proper Lactate threshold test in order to find the actual value. Until then I think I'll try the HR % reserve for now. 

    I'm not that young ! 35.

  • I think I'm getting somewhere guys!!

    Never ran so slow in my life but ended up doing a quck 5k recovery today. I the pace was pretty much the culprit along with using the wrong HR zone method. HR % reserve method seems to be working. Today I ran at 6:15 pace avg and I could nose breathe throughout the entire 5k. 

    Results : 

  • Something is wrong with the Garmin Algorithm. 11.03 to 11.10 introduced this new heart rate metric that has made every run I do that used to be a base run, as a tempo run now. I ran for 1 hour in blue and my watch said my run was a tempo. I bothered Garmin a lot during the beta phase and I don't know what the criteria is for base anymore. On recovery days, I run 9:00 to 9:30s. That has been considered base now. Even though it is 50% Zone 1 or more.

    Don't let the watch control you. Just run to feel. If it felt easy, it was easy. If it felt like a tempo because of intervals or a sustained run. That's what it probably was. I consider the training status and performance condition more. I know when my performance condition will be lower if I'm having trouble staying at a consistent pace for long run days. I know when a status is going to be productive or not based on how I felt after the run. Time times perceived effort.

    Example: I ran 8:30s for 8 miles. Tempo... But that's not how it felt. I run that in my sleep and this particular day was super humid. It even bumped up my heat acclimation since it was a bit warmer then what it has been where I live. Status was maintaining. So that tells me I could of ran a couple more miles to add more to my training load.

    Example: I ran intervals. 1 mile Zone2 or slower. 6x 1ks @ 7:30 to 8:00 minute miles w/ recovery time of 2:30 in between each interval. 1 mile Zone2 or slower cooldown. I would consider this a lower tempo run in terms of exercise load. So this might be more accurate. It was marked tempo. Status was maintaining. I could of pushed more on this interval. I think I can bump my interval paces up. I try to keep intervals at an hour to let my body recover between intervals.

    I have a fartlek run today. So I plan to push up to Zone 4 and Zone 5. Zone 5 should be a pace you can only do for about 2 minutes before you really are wheezing. Zone 4 should be about an hour and a half to sustain before the lactate starts affecting you.

    example: I did this last week and felt fine after the run thanks to recovery, Garmin said it was a tempo, but it felt more like a lower threshold run to me. Status was productive.

    I hope this helps you not go crazy with the stats that Garmin throws at you. There is a lot. Not every stat is important to everyone either.