Related
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Instant Pace Variability

CSTRUNS
over 3 years ago

Recently, I have noticed that my "instant" pace is jumping all over. It's not consistent about when or how. This does happen when trees are around, but certainly not a thick canopy or anything I would be under if trail running. In fact, if I was trail running, I don't think I could use this a gauge for pace. Any suggestions?

  • 0 over 3 years ago

    My situation may be unique, but I’ve found the FR945 to be pretty good with pacing; even as good as the STRYD footpod. I mean it’s seconds off here and there, but for the most part it’s spot on. 

  • 0 over 3 years ago in reply to Tyrese

    agree, I have loved my 945 compared to my last watch (235).  I still often use the LapPace for the most part when pacing efforts where i'm really targeting a pace, but that is somewhat out of habit plus it washes out the little surges or hills.

  • 0 over 3 years ago

    Not an answer, sorry..
    I've turned off instant pace... I just use lap pace whatever that is. current mile/KM or current interval if I'm following a workout. as long as this mile is about the pace I want that's good enough for me.

  • 0 over 3 years ago in reply to KarlosB
    KarlosB said:
    Not an answer, sorry..

    I think it was a good answer and option since the OP has a footpod, but doesn't want to use it.  In this case it might be better to not use it instead of being frustrated. Instant pace has always had its challenges with GPS.  I agree with Tyrese as my 945 works better than my F6, but I always use my Stryd and it works great. 

  • 0 over 3 years ago in reply to nick_nz

    I trained by instant pace with my FR10 it was solid and could adjust from a standstill to 2:03/km sprints. I had to abandon training by instant pace with the 945 and instead go by feel and lap pace. The laps are always the same as FR10 but the instant pace can be off by 30 seconds per km. 

  • 0 over 3 years ago

    If you want more accurate instant pace it's important to have an accurate GPS lock. The first lock on is the most important. Stand at the edge of a road and whilst you wait for the GPS lock to go green scroll to your map on the 945 and make sure your location arrow is on the road you are standing on. You will see it drift towards the road whilst you wait. It may land on the correct position but just wait a few more seconds as it may drift again but if it doesn't drift hit start and begin the run. Your GPS tracks will be accurate and instant pace more accurate 

  • 0 over 3 years ago

    If you want more accurate instant pace it's important to have an accurate GPS lock. The first lock on is the most important. Stand at the edge of a road and whilst you wait for the GPS lock to go green scroll to your map on the 945 and make sure your location arrow is on the road you are standing on. You will see it drift towards the road whilst you wait. It may land on the correct position but just wait a few more seconds as it may drift again but if it doesn't drift hit start and begin the run. Your GPS tracks will be accurate and instant pace more accurate 

  • 0 over 3 years ago

    Thanks for all the replies on this. I have found an on going thread related to Fenix 6 which experiences similar issues as the 945. Some great discussion and data in there. A few things stand out which is exactly what I am seeing: 1) As discussed in this thread - it is a software algorithm issue. 2) Garmin has been made aware multiple times 3) Older models seem less impacted, which is also what I noted as my old 305/910/920 did not see to be as variable. 

    forums.garmin.com/.../instant-pace-is-neither-precise-nor-accurate-and-has-bias-towards-slower-than-actual-pace