This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Strengths of the Forerunner 945

Since forums like this tend to be a place where people complain and post problems with their 945, I’d thought I’d mention some things that the watch does a really good job at:

1. LiveTrack! I absolutely love this feature. I also feel safe when I’m using the the 945 while running at night. Since I work the midnight shift, I often find myself running at very odd hours of the mornings. My wife gets an instant email as to where I am, and of course an alert if there’s an emergency. Outstanding!

2. Pacing- Since my Suunto 9 is still my primary device, my STRYD footpod is still paired with it; and I honestly plan to keep it that way. However the pacing from the 945 is spot on with the STRYD. I don’t know what anyone else’s experience has been, but the Forerunner 945 does a really good job with pacing and mile splits. 

3. Wrist heart rate monitoring- like pacing, I’ve NEVER had a device actually track my heart rate from the wrist until I started using the 945. I mean it’s spot on with my chest strap that’s paired to my Suunto 9. I’m honestly blown away by the accuracy of 945’s OHRM. I heard the Suunto 9 Peak has good wrist based heart monitoring, but why buy that when the 945 works so well. Can we expect the same from the 955?????

4. Track mode- If you’re frustrated with your watches inability to capture GPS on a standard track, than you need a Garmin with track mode. It’s really that simple. I know COROS has something similar, but why buy a COROS after reading what I’ve already written above?

5. Zwift compatibility- A lot of people probably don’t care about this one, but this watch works well with Zwift if you’re using the OHRM. I’m not sure I’d use any watch for accurate pacing on a treadmill, but as I’ve already mentioned, the wrist heart rate monitor in the 945 is just as good as a chest strap. 

6. Data- There’s so much data that you get from Garmin about your current level of fitness. Unlike other watches I’ve used, I actually sort of trust the data I’ve received from Garmin because it’s somewhat consistent with my knowledge of my current level of fitness. Now I wouldn’t fully trust any sports watch with fitness data, but if there was one, this would be the one. 

Finally- size. I normally like big watches like the Suunto 9 Baro. However this watch is not to big or to small. It’s just right. At least for me.

Obviously the 945 has issues but at times they’re out weighed by the positives. I hope anyone considering this watch finds this helpful. 

Anyone agree or disagree with anything here? Please share your thoughts. 

  • For me the strength is nothing specifically but all combined...

    szie/weight+battery+gps+maps+etc...

    Regarding your points, pacing per km/mile indeed is fine but 'instant' pacing is (as a result of using GPS) not... Not a flaw of the 945 specifically but from gps watches. It fluctuates a lot which can be an issue for shorter intervals.

    OHR, good to hear it works for you but unfortunately not for me. It's fine for steady slower long distance runs, but not trustworthy for intervals (and also not trustworthy enough for longer steady runs for me). Earlier watches I had no real issues with, but now I'm running with a Polar OH1 all the time (also as I now train with schemes based on heartrate, so it's kinda important ;) )

    But from what I understood the newer OHR work better (such as the one in the 945LTE). If the bezels in the 945LTE were smaller I'd already have bought it. Improved OHR, faster, etc. But atm I'm holding out as it's too much like the 945 I feel, might change when I have a chance to try it.

    (Especially with maps improved speed would be great)

    But all in all, I love the watch and for me indeed the best option as well yet...

  • I come from a very bad 645M and I am very happy with the 945, I agree with my friend FlipStone that the set of functions are strength. OHR is fine just for H24, in the activities the band is needed otherwise it is all empirical and delayed (I use verity sense), the instantaneous rhythm is reliable only with the foot pod and also the cadence is exact with RDP otherwise it will always be in wrist movement function, but all these are not Garmin defects but of all watches. A priceless feature for me is body battery, on my person very accurate with the new algorithms.

  • I'm very happy with my 945, especially for the OHR (I'm using the watch very tight and the lecture are better) and for daily suggestion routine.

  • OHR, good to hear it works for you but unfortunately not for me. It's fine for steady slower long distance runs, but not trustworthy for intervals (and also not trustworthy enough for longer steady runs for me). Earlier watches I had no real issues with, but now I'm running with a Polar OH1 all the time (also as I now train with schemes based on heartrate, so it's kinda important ;) )

    exacly this with me. But i am using still rythm24 

    And livetrack i was using since Epix. On FR945 i like accident detection. Because of this i dont have to use livetrack all the time :) 

  • using still rythm24 

    I still use the old Scosche Rhythm (the one without on-board memory) sometimes. 

    Greatest strength of the FR945 I find it shows everything on the watch, even sleep. No need to upload any data at all anymore (I do make local backups). Incident detection, on-device 'canned' replies to messages, answering calls, history of runs shows laps at a glance, training status has quite useful overviews. Overall better widgets than FR935/Fenix 5 Plus. I use timers a lot, so having multiple with pre-set times is super useful.

    And much less bugs than Epix! ;-)