This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Graphs

Tyrese over 3 years ago

Are there any resources online to help with understanding the graphs (heart rate, body battery, stress, etc.)? Thanks

Top Replies

Tyrese over 3 years ago in reply to Dr Phil +3

I googled this already and have only found info on Garmin's webpage which wasn't very useful. If you don't know anything outside of the obvious than either say you don't know or ignore the post…
Lazybird over 3 years ago +3

Maybe not exactly what you are looking for, but have an look at https://runalyze.com/

Import one activity, most things are explained if you hoover over the ? next to an item.

Happy running
mcalista over 3 years ago +1

Try https://discover.garmin.com/en-US/performance-data/running/#physiological-measurements

for some details on many of these metrics.

All Replies

0 Dr Phil over 3 years ago in reply to Piquet_H

I'd move on but I find these comments so very amusing.

0 jmto over 3 years ago in reply to Piquet_H

I think you should take a look to the mirror on what are you accusing others and what is your contribution to this topic before continuing it.

And link to some website that tries to explain the metrics isn't a service, Runalyze is commercial service totally irrelevant of Garmin. So there's a kind of big difference you failed to understand.

Writing for himself, so no-one should even answer? Interesting question, this is how I read that interesting question: "I'm lazy, please explain everything to me, I don't even know what term manual is nor I know how to find it".

If we read it like it was written: "Are there any resources online to help with understanding the graphs (heart rate, body battery, stress, etc.)? Thanks". Really good and valid answers are things like: "Yes". If that's too short then: "Yes there are online resources that help to understand these things. Like the 945 manual that is a online resource. https://www8.garmin.com/manuals/webhelp/forerunner945/EN-US/GUID-B8165803-CB4B-4348-B0D8-190DDDD8080C-homepage.html

And there's also two of us that see a problems with that post so? Then there's the OP and you which aren't contributing anything to OP's question, even less than others have.

So if you didn't have anything to contribute the OP's post, why didn't you just then walk away and are trying to take some moral high ground here? Maybe you should follow your own instructions?

0 Piquet_H over 3 years ago in reply to jmto

jmto said:
So if you didn't have anything to contribute the OP's post, why didn't you just then walk away and are trying to take some moral high ground here? Maybe you should follow your own instructions?

It's called the paradox of tolerance. There are multiple examples of others that either ignored the question, or provided some information to the poster - which could stimulate an interesting discussion - ie - a forum. However two of you instead decided to shut the OP down.

I'm tired of the two of you, and instead of walking away I decided to take a moral stance and call you out on it. The standard you walk past is the one you accept. I choose not to accept this sort of behaviour on a question that piqued my interest.

Have I contributed anything to the OP's question? Maybe not. But if the OP at least feels that other people here are tolerant, if other people see this and think, "I don't have to know everything before I engage", then yes - I've achieved something. If this makes you think twice before your next trite reply, then yes - I've achieved something.

jmto said:
And there's also two of us that see a problems with that post so? Then there's the OP and you which aren't contributing anything to OP's question, even less than others have.

Seems you're in the minority. There's more than one positive reply to the question. And there's only two of us that see problems in it. So maybe, the two of you should just be quiet and let those of us who are interested have a discussion.

jmto said:
Writing for himself, so no-one should even answer? Interesting question, this is how I read that interesting question: "I'm lazy, please explain everything to me, I don't even know what term manual is nor I know how to find it".

Yes. This is how *you* read it. And that's a reflection on you, not him.

0 Piquet_H over 3 years ago in reply to Dr Phil

Yes - I know you do

I find that to be part of the problem.

0 Dr Phil over 3 years ago in reply to Piquet_H

Yes - I know you do.

I find that to be the problem.

0 jmto over 3 years ago in reply to Piquet_H

Piquet_H said:
you should just be quiet and let those of us who are interested have a discussion.

So why don't you? I don't think there's nothing stopping you? I think you just choose to have discussion about something else than the graphs. You are not the solution, you are part of the problem.