This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Getting a handle on Battery Impacts

So I know there are a bunch of battery threads already but the point of this one is to try to understand the impact of certain known features on battery life cycles.

For example, Garmin states that the 945 should get about 10 hours of life with both GPS and Music playing through a Bluetooth connection.  I've pretty well corroborated that assertion on my own over countless runs with music where I use battery at a rate of about 10% per hour.

Has anyone been able to substantiate battery drain standards for any of these other scenarios?

- Carrying a phone thus a constant Bluetooth connection

- 1 sec recording vs "Smart" recording

- Navigating a course with a map field included in available data fields.

- Navigating a course withOUT a map field included in available data fields.

- Using a Map field as an available data field but NOT Navigating a course.

- Climbpro?

- Autoclimb?

- Certain CIQ data fields?  Such as:  Stryd power?  The many multifield datafields like Datarun etc.

adding a few others after the original post:

- GPS vs GPS+Glonass or GPS+Galileo

- On board HRM vs External HRM

- Using a CIQ Watchface (but not having it displayed in the activity - strange I know, but I suspect it has an impact)

  • It sure seems like *any* Bluetooth connection while using GPS will burn though about 10% battery per hour as well.  Bluetooth connection to the phone for example.   I ran a 2.5 hour trail run recently, usual settings, carrying my phone in a pack, but no music and I burned through about 25% on that run.

  • BT shouldn't burn that much. The phone connection uses Bluetooth Low Energy protocol, which is very low power drain - sends small packets of data periodically, then the chip shuts down. Bluetooth audio is a different protocol, with large amounts of data requiring virtually continuous chip uptime (and consequent battery hit)

    Not disputing your figures, but something else must have been going on.

  • Right.  I would sure like to figure it out as I don't get anywhere near the battery drain rates I'm seeing on here in day to day use.  The best I ever see is .2-.3% per hour on occasion but my long term average is about .9-1% or 4 days total.  I average at least 1 hour of GPS use a day though.

    No SP02 and all other settings on lowest settings AFAIK.

  • I've been trying to maximize the battery life during my runs, as I sometimes do runs up to 100 hours for races. Also need to keep the GPS accuracy (so no ultratrac) and I want to still be able to navigate and see my heart rate. I use about 3 percent an hour, displaying 4 fields I care about: battery level, heart rate, distance, and time of day. If I change my display to fields that CHANGE more often, I get more battery drain. For instance if I go with" time, pace, distance, and heart rate, I get about 4 percent battery drain an hour. So that minor change in display makes my watch go from 33+ hours to about 24 hours. Oh, and I use GPS, not combined with any of the other satelites. Not sure if that has an impact. Here's my take on some of the other features you were interested in:

    - Carrying a phone thus a constant Bluetooth connection:  I tell my watch to not provide notifications 

    - 1 sec recording vs "Smart" recording: not seen a difference

    - Navigating a course with a map field included in available data fields; when I do navigation, it becomes a data field I can see when I want. I typically only go to that field rarely, instead usually I use the little red arrow that moves around the perimeter of the watch on my normal display to navigate

    - Navigating a course withOUT a map field included in available data fields.: didn't think this was possibe, but maybe I don't get your point

    - Using a Map field as an available data field but NOT Navigating a course.: kind of what I typically do. I don't think it makes much of a battery drain, if any if you never go to that navigation field. The little red arrow that moves around your normal display seems to not make a battery drian difference.

    - Climbpro?: I've scrolled to this occassionally, but again I think since I use it only a few times during a run I don't notice a battery issue.

    - Autoclimb? nope, not looked into

    To summarize, to maximize battery life during a run, try limiting fields displayed that don't change often.

  • Good info, thanks.

    I did a recent long long run using the following settings and burned 55% of battery in 9.5 hours.  I am baffled as to how I am supposed to get 24+ hours but your suggestion about constantly changing data fields might be one of the ways.  I use a CIQ data field that shows 7 different metrics, several of which (HR, power, paces, etc) are constantly changing.

    Here are the settings I had for that run:

    - Phone with me, but Bluetooth OFF.

    - Watch navigating, however turn by turn notifications OFF and I only looked at the map page sparingly.

    - GPS only, no glonass or galileo

    - Lap notifications set for each mile (vibrate & sound)

    - ANT+ devices connected:  Stryd, Scosche HRM, Tempe

    - OHR OFF so no Spo2 etc

  • Did a 15h10min hike today, accidentally hat bluetooth on (but my phones bluetooth was off)

    circled through all data screens ocassionally (hr gauge, map, ascent / descent gauge, standard screen with elevation and total ascent, time and distance)

    GPS only

    no SPO2

    No CIQ Datafields (my assumption is, they are a battery burner, just as everything that is non native)

    no navigation (noticed navigation is also a battery burner, both on my edge830 and the forerunner, that's just normal I think and can also be observed on other devices)

    had 54% battery left

  • That's excellent, extrapolates out to over 30 hours of total life.  I'm getting the impression CIQ data fields cause a fair sized hit.  As a Stryd user I have to have 1 installed, and I usually add 1 other as well.  Good to know if I ever decide to go for 20+ hours.

  • So I experimented this weekend with some new settings.  Same as on my 9.5 hour run from a couple months ago, but with some small tweaks.  I took away my main CIQ data field (still had the Stryd one though) and I had no navigation running, and I disabled auto-lap (but I manually lapped instead).  All of the rest of these were the same:

    - Phone with me, but Bluetooth OFF on the watch.

    - GPS only, no glonass or galileo

    - ANT+ devices connected:  Stryd, Scosche HRM, Tempe

    - OHR OFF so no Spo2 etc

    At the end of 11.5 hours of running I still had 55% battery remaining.  That extrapolates to 25.5 hours of total use and is a significant increase over my previous attempt where I had only 45% left after 9.5 hours of running.  The CIQ datafield and/or navigation must've made the difference.  

  • Well that's a little better. I also did a run recently and disabled bluetooth on my watch, leaving my data fields as I described above. Went for an 8 hour run. Seemed to move my battery usage from 33+ hours to more like 36 hours total. I also use the autolap feature, so I think your disabling that feature likely has little impact (I only have a beep notification, not vibrate). While you probably really want the ANT+devices, I'm thinking that's your biggest battery drain. You should try and not wear them a run, using your watch's heart rate monitor instead (but not the Sp02) as an experiment.

  • Yeah I should mention that I have beep+vibration set for all alerts.  So laps, turn-by-turn, Bluetooth notifications, etc all would take a hit more than just beep alone.  All of those were turned off on my 11.5 hour run, but manually lapping 30+ times triggered a vibration as well.