Related
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Fenix 6 vs. Forerunner 645

vanderloo
over 5 years ago

Debating between fenix 6 for it's hiking, gps capabilities. Vs. Forerunner 645. But if the fenix needs a satelite connection for elevation graphics, back to start, breadcrumb capabilities then it won't be usefull. Is this the case?
Any other comparison input would be appreciated.

My primary use will be running.

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 5 years ago
    vanderloo said:
    But if the fenix needs a satelite connection for elevation graphics, back to start, breadcrumb capabilities then it won't be usefull

    You would have to have a GPS (satellite) connection on either watch to use the features you mentioned.  How else would the watch know your current location to give you elevation data, a path back to start or to follow breadcrumbs?

  • 0 over 5 years ago in reply to Former Member

    Thanks TMK17. I could have been a bit more descriptive, but my point was-

    The 645 doesn't have the hiking, backpacking features I would like to have.

    So if I need satellite connection to enable the fenix' backpacking features, I guess I'll just settle for the 645.

    I don't think anywhere I have packed has a signal.

    scothunter2 If you don't have anything constructive to offer, maybe just STFU.

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 5 years ago in reply to vanderloo

    I see. You should be able to get some sort of satellite signal while hiking even in dense foliage that could be useful. There are several IQ apps you could download for the 645 to use for hiking. I have a 945 which has maps and a native hiking app, but I prefer to use the Hike2+ app by jim_m_58. dwMaps also sets up great routes to use on your watch. Based on your needs, I'd suggest the 645.  With the add-ons you'd get what you need for hiking and running (minus maps) and at a much cheaper price.  If you haven't done so already, check out this product comparison site.  I listed the two cheapest Fenix 6 models, but you can select any model you wish to compare.  This may assist in your decision.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/catalog/product/compareResult.ep?compareProduct=641501&compareProduct=641449&compareProduct=591311&compareProduct=612476

  • 0 over 5 years ago in reply to Former Member

    I'd also throw the fr245 into the mix.  It's got most of the features of the 645, and even a few more.  And both run Hike2  Slight smile

  • 0 over 5 years ago in reply to jim_m_58

    Thanks Guys. Very helpful info. I don't think I've seen the fr245 Jim. I'll throw it in the mix for comparison

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 5 years ago in reply to vanderloo

    Yes, the 245 may fit your needs also. Everyone has different needs and the product comparison site can narrow down your your selection.  Then you can visit those forums for more detailed questions.  I will also add; even though it'll piss some forum members off, if you find a Garmin watch you like, research and compare it to a similar watch from a competitor before you pull the trigger.  I believe you'll find Garmin has the better choices. Do what's best for you.  Best of luck 3258240.

  • 0 over 5 years ago in reply to vanderloo

    Many people don’t realise this but you DON’T need to spend £600 on a Fenix for hiking, despite what Garmin’s marketing department tell you. The £300 Forerunner 645 has a walk profile that will track your hikes perfectly well, as good as any Fenix will. It has a barometric altimeter, an electronic compass, and you can even pre-load co-ordinates onto the watch as Saved Locations and do point to point navigation. There are apps available that allow you to input British Grid References as waypoints (something which the native 645 software lacks). The 645 is not just a running watch, it’s also a fantastic navigation aid for when you are out in the hills and want to return to your car / camp. I personally think the maps on the higher end devices are over-rated. All I need is a moving arrow and a distance to destination.