Related
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Benchmark results - 265 similar to 255

socorsu
over 1 year ago

Hi,

Thanks to 

https://forums.garmin.com/sports-fitness/running-multisport/f/forerunner-955-series/326176/955-vs-the-265---my-experience-as-a-955-user/1586346#1586346

Firmware 3.56, CIQ 4.20

  • FR965
    • CPU 7.8 / 58.8 Pips
  • FR265
    • CPU 7.8 / 62.5 Pips

It's similar to FRx55 models

For your information

Gen - 2019 - 2021 Gen 2022 - 2023

Fenix 6

CPU 4.2 / 32.3 Pips 

Fenix 7

CPU 9.4 / 58.8 Pips 

FR x45

same results

FR x55 & FRx65

same results

https://forums.garmin.com/outdoor-recreation/outdoor-recreation/f/fenix-6-series/318547/garmin---fenix-6-enduro-tactix-delta-quatix-6-marq---connect-iq-benchmark

  • 0 over 1 year ago

    You'll see the difference with CIQ 4 devices.  Devices with CIQ 4 (like the f7) have a GPU, while CIQ 3 devices (like the f6) don't have a GPU.

  • 0 over 1 year ago in reply to jim_m_58

    Hi, thanks your right, this should add extra perf day-to-day because of offloading the CPU of specific tasks.

    http://www.f-blog.info/garmin-fenix-7x-solar-teardown-non-destructive/

    "Another new thing for Garmin is this processor has a GPU. It’s for 2D vector graphics and can run at 200 MHz speed. Garmin Venu and Epix has AMOLED screens with higher resolution displays with support for much more colours. This creates a need for more memory and processing power. Additionally, new generation Garmin watches have touch screen and you wouldn’t want the object on the display move a second later you move your finger. Thus GPU and better LCD controller is needed on newer watches."