The Edge 840 gave after a 2h ride a 241W FTP value (from 238W). in this 2h ride there was 1h 254avgW (with 0 watts included in the average, of course), 268xPower, 270wNP, the HR was for this 1h apprx 85%MaxHR, 10BPM below LTHR.
My simple question to the Garmin / FirstBeat engineers: dont you think that it is not so professional (or with one word: a joke)
if somebody can ride for 1h with such a parameters, the estimated FTP is around 280-290W. but in worst scenario, the Garmin must give 254W as Estimated FTP because the rider rode 1h at this power. if calculating from the best 20min avg, that is 279x0.95=265W. if we calculating and interpolating with power/hr ratio with this 1h 254W, then between 280-290W, but not 241W that is 1000% sure. too low and the suggested trainings will be too low, with zone/s/ lower, lets say a 2h base ride suggestion 241x0.65=155w but it is only 155/280 , which is FTP55%, so a recovery ride with 0 benefit...
so Garmin-Blake , Garmin-Clayton , can you tell it to the responsible person to tweak a "bit" on this FirstBeat algorhythm? the FR965 gave also the same value, so the whole actual FirstBeat stuff is still bad, since 2.5 years for sure.