Hey there,
My apologies straight off - I've seen some threads a while back that touch on this, can't spot them now, and wanted to get my head around it.
I love the garmin connect system and the data it gives me. Even if some bits are questionable I like that it probably tracks my improvement (or otherwise) quite well.
I use a forerunner 945 and an edge 830 on a tacx turbo trainer (or outdoors on my Giant Defy). I use Zwift for entertainment. I don't have a power meter on the bike.
1) Garmin connect has a dropdown for each device in the "Load Focus" section - the anerobic, high aerobic, and low aerobic do not change as you toggle between devices but the overall message above it does. When the bike is selected it says Anaerobic shortage, when the watch is selected it says low aerobic shortage - yet the 3 levels stay the same.
Can I take it then that the message is per device, but the levels in the graphs are across both devices and so give me an overall picture? For example, I've had a message before that says "go for a walk or an easy bike ride" - I assume if so that it would address the deficit across both devices?
2) I love using Zwift and the Zwift recording if sent to GC or to Strava will show the elevation of the ride, and therefore I assume the appropriate calories burnt (as an example, though I realise this is only a ballpark and not that accurate). However, recording with the 830, using the Tacx as the trainer unit, doesn't result in any elevation on my GC ride, only HR. speed, cadence. Can GC really then be showing appropriate values for that ride whilst treating it like a flat ride when actually it may have been really hilly?
3) If I use my head unit and ride a past ride from it, where it knows the elevation etc, the trainer then mimicks the inclines - and I think (I forgot to check) that GC would show the inclines and would be giving a more accurate reading of how the ride was?
3) I'm sure I've seen someone say don't bother trying to resolve any differences in speed between Zwift and your garmin head unit - but is there a way to get a similar reading from the two? I'd have to check but one reason mine may differ could be that I dialled down the trainer difficulty level in Zwift a bit.
It seems a real shame that there can't be a more seamless system when using Zwift.
Thank you for any replies :-)