Average respiration rate - sleep higher than awake

Just noticed that my average respiration rate while asleep is higher on average by 2 beats vs awake (between 13-14), looking at the 4 week period.  Similar for previous periods.

I assume awake excludes recorded activities to avoid variances vs days you're not working out, likewise asleep should excludes those when you have woke up to go to the bathroom or you are simply not sleeping during the sleep hours you set.

I'm not a "dreamy" person, as they say it can go up during REM phases.

Just wondering what to make out of this.  Or anyone else have this reading.

Top Replies

  • it’s 4 beat

    Not that it would be important, since in the context everyone knows what you mean, but just to avoid the eventual confusion otherwise:

    The "bpm" at the respiratory rate does…

All Replies

  • Frankly told, I would not rely on the numbers at all. I do often breath exercises, where I can breathe only once in a minute during half an hour, but the watch will consistently tell me I am breathing ~14 breaths per minute. And it is completely wrong even at less extreme breath exercises, not even speaking about several minutes long breath-holds. It won't detect any of it. And paradoxically, when I start the activity "Breathwork", I can breathe 20 times per minute, but the watch will still log just the number of breaths prescribed by the workout (for example 4 bpm at the short Relax & Focus exercise) even if I do not respect it at all.

    It may perhaps work better for someone else, but for myself I found it utterly useless. 

    The only place where I see it delivering relatively credible data, is during the Running activities when I wear the HRM-Pro belt, which is comprehensible, since it delivers more reliable HRV data (which is used for detecting the breathing rate).

  • Same here, for me it’s 4 beat on average

  • it’s 4 beat

    Not that it would be important, since in the context everyone knows what you mean, but just to avoid the eventual confusion otherwise:

    The "bpm" at the respiratory rate does not mean "beats per minute" (that's just for the heart rate), it is "breaths per minute"

  • Yes - of course you’re right -  I meant „breath” - somehow, when talking about metrics it’s mostly beats per minute, so it got there “automatically” ;-) in a way

  • If I do breathing exercises, it shows very accurately, but you have to take a long time, it doesn't record one breath hold. (diving) But after 15 minutes of meditation, it shows correctly like 5 breaths per minute or less. A person must be absolutely still, otherwise it does not measure at all, stop moving (diving, exercising).

  • If I do breathing exercises, it shows very accurately,

    As I wrote, it is just an illusion. It will always just show the breathing rate prescribed by the breathwork exercise, not the real one. At least it was the case with me, when I tested it. You can do the same test too. See my results for 6 different tests below on the image. I did the workout exercises in identical way - sitting at the desktop, no moving, no diving, of course.

    Using the 6 min breathwork exercise Focus & Relax. Counting my breaths carefully, and keeping it identical during the whole workout. The first test was with some hyperventilation during the whole time (20 breaths / min), second one was with normal breathing (12 brpm), third one was following the prescribed rate 4 brpm (4-4-4-4 / inhale-hold-exhale-hold), the 4th test was done slower than prescribed - a breath each 30s, the 5th test was just a single breath each minute, and the 6th test was a long breath hold. In all 6 cases the prescribed 4 breaths / min were incorrectly detected (with just some brief small deviations of maximally +/- 1 brpm)

    Then, I repeated the test wearing the HRM-Pro, and hoped it would work better, but in fact it did not detect any breathing at all. Also no graph for the breathing rate with the HRM-Pro:

  • I don't do preset exercises, I just start the yoga app. :-)

    Nothing is perfect. :-)

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 2 years ago

    I don't think this is a problem with the watch.