I live in a hilly area, not mountainous, mostly low percentage grade and usually constantly changing, but can remain climbing for 2 miles or more, I'm in the UK (these are not hills you try and sprint). I've done lab based treadmill tests and I know I'm a "volume responder". Doing a ton of high aerobic work or long anaerobic intervals pulls me apart. I've had great success focussing on:
Hill Sprints (10seconds uphill flat out, 2~3min rest)
Lots of genuinely easy pace (around 2/3rds of VO2max pace when on the flat.. not letting heart rate climb on hills)
Marathon Pace (up to 1hour sessions at an effort which elicits around 4% heart rate drift over that hour.. give or take.. again controlling heart rate on the flat, climbs and descents)
Once trained I will then add in some 25x200m sessions at around current 5k pace, but only 2~3 sessions before a peak race.
At 50year old I've broken the 1h30min half marathon, 40min 10k and 19min 5k.
Given that why is my hill strength in the toilet? How is it calculated?.. i.e. is it the average all all hill runs?. just the best 10% of hills? does it take into account how hard people run uphill or just take a dumb "other people went strongly anaerobic so went a bit faster".
If it's simply your average pace/power uphill taking no account of effort or hill length, then I'll ignore as that would be a monumentally stupid metric.