It really is a better GPS in the forest. I mainly run trail runs.Is the battery really better? Thank you for the information
It really is a better GPS in the forest. I mainly run trail runs.Is the battery really better? Thank you for the information
Here's the Fenix 6X Pro (non-Sapphire) compared to Fenix 7X Pro Solar (non-Sapphire):
IIRC The F7 Pro series introduced a new higher contrast version of the MIP screen compared to the F7 non-Pro.
In…
Hyvä Sami,
Thanks for the fairly detailed comparison and battery report. I always appreciate long and precise user reviews as yours.
Dare I ask you for additional help like
a) the same sort of picture…
Thanks everyone, since wednesday I am the owner of fénix 7xpro. I can only warmly recommend it, it meets all my uses.
in the forest. I mainly run trail runs.Is the battery really better? Thank you for the information
Yes to your questions, but ...
If you have the standard 6X (PART NUMBER010-02157-00) with Gorilla glass, you will be disappointed with the contrast/brightness of the display of the 7X.
HTH
Here's the Fenix 6X Pro (non-Sapphire) compared to Fenix 7X Pro Solar (non-Sapphire):
IIRC The F7 Pro series introduced a new higher contrast version of the MIP screen compared to the F7 non-Pro.
In daytime / inside use I find no major difference between the F6X Pro and the F7X Pro Solar screens. The F7X Pro Solar might have tiny bit more reflection on the glass, when comparing side-by-side, but nothing I notice in real life use.
In night use the backlight on the F7X Pro Solar is much better, being moe neutral in color. With backlight on the screen has much, much higher contrast than the F6X Pro.
Regarding OP's questions:
GPS:
Big difference.
WIth the F6X Pro my GPS recording always had 2-15m offset to the left in hilly and/or forest areas (with watch on my left wrist).
With the F7X Pro Solar I can go back-and-forth multiple times and the recorded tracks will have minimal differences. In Multiband / Auto Select GNSS mode the recorded tracks are very precise and the pace on screen won't mysteriously drop due to some tree cover.
Battery life:
I've had the F7X Pro Solar for two weeks now and have gone through one full and another partial battery cycle. Battery life has been good.
Battery life during activities, with following settings: maps ON, Course ON, Display timeout ON, Phone disconnected, Accessories disconnected:
Haven't used other GNSS modes, but the Power Mode estimates (with my settings):
Not sure if those estimations take Solar in account. Living at 60N latitude with sun currently rising only six degrees above the southern horizon, for less than six hours.. there's obviously not much benefit from the Solar capability right now. Come summer and the 18h long days.. hopefully it's a different case then.
In comparison, during the past 1½ months the ~4-year-old F6X Pro consumed on average 3.11% per hour with similar Power Mode settings, with potential 100% being 32 hours. Though there's quite a bit of variation between recordings, with some being around 2.5%/h, and some over 4%/h. On F7X Pro Solar it's more consistent.
When the F6X Pro was two years old, it consumed 2.05%/h in similar conditions with similar settings (potential 100% 48.78h). I bought my F6X Pro 2nd hand, so unfortunately can't give numbers for a new specimen.
In general:
Overall the F7X Pro Solar is all-around snappier tool. Menus are faster. Courses load instantly vs 5-10s delay with the F6X Pro. Maps load fast and are easy to scroll with touchscreen. On the F6X Pro scrolling maps is slow due to button interface and the incremental loading of areas around the screen. F7X Pro Solar GPS performance is great.
Personally I didn't feel like updating to the F7 series was necessary other than the so-so GPS performance and slightly degrading battery life. But I found a good deal on a three-weeks-old F7X Pro Solar, which has the newest V5 Elevate HR sensor and better MIP screen (over the F7X SS), thus couldn't resist it... Should be good for the next ~4 years at least.
If one currently has an F6 series watch and is happy with it - I'd keep using it. The F6 series has seen lots of software updates and is very useful tool for fitness, sports and adventures. But the F7 Pro series certainly has many QOL improvements..
I had a 6X Pro, I have a 7X Pro, I'll write you what the main differences are:
- better battery - F6X I charged on average every 18-19 days or so ( blood saturation measurement turned off) - 7X Pro - charges once a month.
- most of the widgets that you have in the 6X appear in the 7X in a more expanded form - they present more information.
- you have the ability to update it from the watch - only access to the network via WIFI is required.
- solar charging - I have noticed practically no profit from this ( but supposedly in order for the battery level to increase after solar charging you have to restart the watch - total stupidity )
- I do not use touch - I have permanently disabled - it was able to me in the shower under the influence of water to behave as if activated by a finger.
- I have it for half a year - so far I have not found any disadvantages against the F6X
"IIRC The F7 Pro series introduced a new higher contrast version of the MIP screen compared to the F7 non-Pro" - That is good to know, thanks.
I have a hard time with low contrast, reflections and small display on my 7 Sapphire Solar and was thinking to going to a (used) 7X non-pro.
But if a 7X Pro has a much better screen, I'll wait for that to appear on the second-hand market. In the mean time I'll use my 6X Solar, pretty good display and does basically everything I need.
IIRC The F7 Pro series introduced a new higher contrast version of the MIP screen compared to the F7 non-Pro
Can you cite a source for this very interesting info? I have never seen or read anything about any upgraded higher contrast MIP screen. In fact, the nature of LCD makes it hard to understand how the display contrast itself could possibly be increased. The watch crystal (i.e. cover glass) with/without touch capability, with/without solar capability, whether sapphire or Gorilla Glass, would all affect contrast; but the display itself would remain the same.
TIA for the citation for your claim.
HTH
It's mentioned at least by some reviewers, for example in DC Rainmaker's review: https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2023/05/garmin-fenix-7-pro-in-depth-review-flashlight-and-multiband-for-everyone.html
New Pixel Design: Redesigned the display at the pixel level to achieve better display balance in all lighting conditions; improving indoor readability with higher contrast, increased color saturation and luminance. Garmin says these changes “improve the indoor light experience without sacrificing performance in outdoors.”
New Backlight Design: Increased brightness, dimness (can go dimmer in certain conditions), and power efficiency of the backlight. We are also now utilizing the solar panel itself as an ambient light sensor. Garmin says these “improve usability and power efficiency and automatically adapts the backlight to different lighting conditions.”
It's also on Garmin's official product announcement: https://www.garmin.com/en-US/newsroom/press-release/outdoor/garmin-unveils-next-gen-fenix-7-pro-series/