Why bother with a HR monitor?

Former Member
Former Member

I am awaiting delivery of an Instinct which I am aware does not have VO2 Max.

The watch will primarily be used for running (I appreciate there are more 'running focused' Garmins out there but the Instinct has more or less what I need and looks great). Given that the Instinct does not have training load or VO2 max I wondered if there was any point in purchasing a HR monitor (ie maybe I have missed something).

  • You can also get very accurate VO2 and other metrics on runalyze.com

    I'd be careful with the adjective "very accurate". You get very accurate VO₂max in the lab, using a pro HRM, powermeter, and a breathing mask analyzing both the O₂ consumption, and the exhaled CO₂.

    You get a relatively good estimate with devices using the HR Variability for detecting the lactate threshold. Firstbeat, the author of the algorithm, claims 5% within the lab results.

    And you can also get an approximate estimation by the plain HR (without the Variabilty data) - and that's what runalyze does.

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 4 years ago in reply to darnich

    Didnt know that.

    I actually would have kept the watch in any event if it was bigger around a G Shock size.

    For me the most important metrics are good GPS (which it had) and HR to a lesser extent as you can always use a strap. However the HR was great.

    Size matters unfortunately

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 4 years ago in reply to trux

    So the HRM Run is within that 5%?

  • So the HRM Run is within that 5%?

    HRM Run alone does not calculate VO₂max. You need a watch doing it, and all of the recent Garmin watch models use the Firstbeat HR Variability algorithms, regardless whether you use a compatible external HRM, or the one built in. Instinct too, but as written, it does not support the VO₂max calculation (by design). It uses the HRV just for other features like the Body Battery, Stress monitoring, Sleep monitoring, etc.

  • Thanks - I was drawn to it for 2 main reasons:

    1. The solar cell - my fenix would ONLY just last an Ironman Tri - although I'm too old for them now Slight smile
    2. The surf aspect - trying to recapture youth via tech - sad I know....

    tbh - the VO2 and Training effect were more motivational factors for my running - its absolute accuracy isn't the crux of the matter - more of an indicator of an improvement trend.

    Cheers

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 4 years ago in reply to trux

    Very helpful, thanks!

  • the VO2 and Training effect were more motivational factors for my running - its absolute accuracy isn't the crux of the matter - more of an indicator of an improvement trend.

    Sure, I understood, and have no problem with it. I just wanted to make clear it is really only a very raw estimate, and no true VO₂max. Still may be sufficient for hobby runners / bikers like most of us, although it could lead to problems if a pro athlete tried to manage his training plan with it.

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 4 years ago in reply to robbiemcmillan

    Its never sad trying to recapture (or remain in) youth. I think once you stop being playful and stop 'moving' you seize up physically and mentally (however that is probably for a different forum lol).

    Kudos on even entering an Ironman and noted re battery life. I have a 30 miles ultra coming up and that, at the moment is my max, which should be easily handled by the Fenix 3.

    All the best for Christmas!

  • Thanks and good luck for the ultra.

    Merry Christmas too. Cheers

  • Thanks for the info - very useful and if only I was ever good enough to be pro. Happy to be a hobby boy!

    Merry Christmas :)