Hello,
I recently changed from a 235 to the Fenix 5 for running and I have noticed a poor GPS signal under trees with the Fenix 5 compared to the 235. Having spent a lot of money on what I would hope to be an upgrade it has been a bit rubbish in the GPS department. Especially since I rely heavily on knowing current and average pace at all times. These tend to go haywire under trees with the Fenix 5 but were solid as a rock with the 235.
I have added two screen shots of a Parkrun I do every week. Along the top at 4 km is a tree line and you can see the 235 does a much better job at recording the GPS. As a result the Fenix 5 actually records to distance as 3.08 miles instead of 3.1.
Any ideas of the cause, or possibly solutions? I have tried both GPS Normal and GPS GLONASS but they are no different. I know GPS watches can be a bit iffy under trees and around houses but for a Fenix 5 to be worse than the 235 is a bitter disappointment :(
Thanks, ciq.forums.garmin.com/.../1471100.png ciq.forums.garmin.com/.../1471101.png