Bogus RHR widget diagram

Same flustration here.... you always have to calculate which line represents which number, and than approximate what could be the values...
I think a BAR chart with 7 lines, each line with the textual value would be great option.
somethink like activity history widget, which was available for Fenix 3

It appears to me that the watch automatically sets the number of the top and bottom lines to whatever multiples of 10 are necessary to contain The range daily RHR values have been calculated for the prior 7 days and that range is always divided into quadrants by the three graph lines. Right now my top and bottom lines are 50 and 40; a couple of days ago they were 50 and 30. I don't find it very difficult to understand the gist of the RHR trend from the graph, but if you need exact numbers for prior days, you can get them on the Connect app.

It appears to me that the watch automatically sets the number of the top and bottom lines to whatever multiples of 10 are necessary to contain The range daily RHR values have been calculated for the prior 7 days and that range is always divided into quadrants by the three graph lines. Right now my top and bottom lines are 50 and 40; a couple of days ago they were 50 and 30. I don't find it very difficult to understand the gist of the RHR trend from the graph, but if you need exact numbers for prior days, you can get them on the Connect app.

Yeah, sure.. only the numbers are rewritten, the background lines are the same, because it's easy to implement.
BUT, it would be so much easier to read, if the widget was programmed in a way, that the number of lines is not a fix value, but dynamically adapts.

Like:
p = (high - low) / 10
if (p mod 2) == 0 then num_lines = 3 // covers p mod 4 == 0
if (p mod 3) == 0 then num_lines = 2
if (p mod 5) == 0 then num_lines = 4 // not very likely, but hey ...

With num_lines being the number of lines inbetween.

Garmin plotting (be it on the watch, GC or GCM) is absolute crap! There too many inconsistencies/errors/bugs that it doesn't make sense losing sleep over it.

It's hard to swallow but a $500+ Garmin is the best we have as Suunto and Polar are even worse ...

And when I say crap, I mean crap and let me substantiate it. Look at the attached plot from GCM and try to spot how many things are wrong with it. I won't spoil the fun, just try! ;-)