the 5s is accurate enough and similar to the previous models
I would be interested to know if there is any difference in GPS strength between the 5 and the 5S. My 5 is really poor in an urban environment. The tracks zig zag along straight roads.
So your instant pace during the run was consistent and usable and lap markers spot on? Maybe you have different requirements on your device than others, which is fine, and I'm glad it works for you!
Doesn't sound very convincing to me, like you wouldn't care about little inconsistencies in your data. No offense.
Is your pace data complete? Does your pace graph look erratic?
Nope, don't see any significant inconsitencies. But then again I am not a professionally running, just getting ready for a marathon.
Doesn't sound very convincing to me, like you wouldn't care about little inconsistencies in your data. No offense.
Is your pace data complete? Does your pace graph look erratic?
I'd really like to know. I returned my F5 because of the faulty GPS and can't decide wether to buy a new F5 and try again or maybe go with a F5S instead.
Thanks.
Zig zag?
Well, have a look at my first run on a track with the F5:
http://imgur.com/a/guKWD
I'm pretty sure, I was running along the track ^^
And some people have realistic expectations from their devices. If the user of the device is happy, what right have you to pick faults?