The Tree Benchmark app isn't listed in the CIQ App Store for either the Fenix 5 or 5X yet. The CIQ Benchmark app is there though https://apps.garmin.com/en-US/apps/7d836871-cf67-4963-b56b-1d81a7808ba0 with my Fenix 5 giving scores of 4.7 for CPU and 15.6 for Pips. Might be interesting to know what the 5X has with this app until the Tree Benchmark is available.
The Tree Benchmark app isn't listed in the CIQ App Store for either the Fenix 5 or 5X yet. The CIQ Benchmark app is there though https://apps.garmin.com/en-US/apps/7d836871-cf67-4963-b56b-1d81a7808ba0 with my Fenix 5 giving scores of 4.7 for CPU and 15.6 for Pips. Might be interesting to know what the 5X has with this app until the Tree Benchmark is available.
OK, I didnt realise Tree Benchmark wasnt listed for 5/5X a I dont have one yet.
Thanks for the CIQ score.
At least I know the 5 is much faster than my F3HR at CPU 0.6 / 10.1 Pips.
The Tree Benchmark app isn't listed in the CIQ App Store for either the Fenix 5 or 5X yet. The CIQ Benchmark app is there though https://apps.garmin.com/en-US/apps/7d836871-cf67-4963-b56b-1d81a7808ba0 with my Fenix 5 giving scores of 4.7 for CPU and 15.6 for Pips. Might be interesting to know what the 5X has with this app until the Tree Benchmark is available.
My results on the 5X: CPU 4.3 and PIPS between 14.9 and 15.6 (couldn't get a single consistent result)
Interresting that 5X has worse result than 5, but I suppose it can be due to pre-loaded maps in the memory or something like that. On the other side, 5X seems to be the fastest device I've seen from the UX perspective. The scrolling between complex watchface, custom widgets etc. is pretty quick and smooth without any sluggishness. I suppose there is some kind of graphical co-processor or bigger display buffer..?
