So it begins.
I will have mine Fenix 5 on Saturday and will start doing comparisons to an Ambit 3 Peak. I don't have an F3 to directly compare to as of now.
Anyone have an F3 and F5 to compare?
Eh... yup. The tracks are just the symptom, the actual issue is the gps accuracy (which results in an issue with lap pace, mile/km markers, etc).
As much as I like the F5 I bought it mainly for running (and perhaps hiking) and with that I want it to be as precise as possible... It's nice that the tracks and distances are fine in Garmin Connect, but as I mentioned earlier this thread that's not what counts for me. For me it matters that the source is good, not that garmin (connect) somehow knows how to make it show up fine.
I can only send the watch back for 4 weeks after buying (which is already more then the usual 2 weeks) so I can't give it another month or 2 and send it back if I don't like it then. And all the reading I did into the F3 and my hunch about the F5 I am not counting on this getting fixed.
Then I'd have to cut my losses and sell it. So yeah, I'm going to send it back in order to give the 935 a try since as far as I've seen it does give better and more consistent tracks.
About looks, I'm with you that the F5 looks better (even though I haven't seen the 935 in real life yet, unfortunately not for sale here yet) and if I didn't like the F5 looks so much I wouldn't have thought so long about exchanging it for the 935, then it would be an instant decision.
Distance accrual is negatively affected with Stryd,when Stryd is set for Pace: Always, Distance: Indoors for outdoor runs for some reason related to the Stryd dropouts. I did not try Stryd set for Distance:Always as I was having massive dropouts (>80% of the time it was disconnected during my runs).
This is exactly how I'm feeling. I had a F3HR and most recently a F5. While I was able to get smooth GPS tracks, the pacing was all over the place telling me the raw data collection is poor. I received a FR935 yesterday and there was a visible difference in consistency of the data collected. When the source info is not good, there's only so much correcting you can do. My hypothesis is that Garmin has not figured out how to compensate for the metal bezel. Until they figure that out, the Forerunners will continue to be more consistent. I too will be returning the F5. While I think the F5 is a much nicer looking watch, it's all about the data for me.
FWIW - Here are the two watches side-by-side https://goo.gl/photos/QWV71BZbjCwzatSR9
Although I like the look of F5, I don't think FR935 looks so much worse. Actually, I myself like it a lot and don't regret returning my F5 and ordering FR935 in case GPS will work as I "need". Beside, there are other benefits for me coming from FR935 over F5.
Maybe we should start The FR935 Converts Club. :)
Thanks for the details. I tried the Styrd for the first time on a treadmill run yesterday and had a solid connection, but I'll need more testing of both connection and data recorded of course. I know you have/had issues, but there's another forum member who has had improved accuracy using Stryd with the F5x and has not mentioned connection issues. I'm hoping my experience will be the latter and using Stryd for distance and pace, along with the 5x and GPS on, will give me the best accuracy along with the 5x features.
Issue does not exist for the 5x, only the 5/5s. Part of the problem when you are posting and reading the 5/5s forum and have a 5x I guess ;)