Does distance this seem right

This number could be correct. The face to path is right of path which created a lot of right side spin and is a distance killer. At sea level you would need another 10mph ball speed and more face to path left of club path which would lead to a straighter shot or draw. The face to path left also takes some loft off the club and creates greater ball speed. Launch the ball around 17 degrees and face to path closing ( in to out swing) and see if the ball speed gets to 105.

Altitude and temp will be a factor too.

Chris Weidt does a YouTube video explaining the numbers.

He hits a very high ball but his side spin is minimal. At 116 ball speed his carry was showing 154 yds. Launch was 24 degrees. When that ball comes down on the green it’s not rolling out much.

There is a lot to learn about ball flight but it helps in order to know what is really going on with a golf swing.

Makes sense. It looks like I was getting my nasty side cut ut again. I’m starting to get that out of my system and getting much better ball flight.

The R50 chronically undermesures distance, as reported here and on reviews and everywhere.

If needed you can increase elevation to match what you would see on the golf course. It is a little under compared to Awesome golf. I think Awesome golf is a bit more accurate with the distances. Ball speed and club speed are the same.

You can plug these numbers into the flightscope trajectory optimizer to compare. 

I've done this with some of my raw data, and the numbers are always consistent. 

Edited: External link removed per Garmin Forum Terms of Use.