I just acquired a refurbished Oregon 400t. I did this following a fairly extensive Internet survey of the published reviews of the various Garmin handheld GPS products.
This is my first handheld and I am new to such GPS use. (During the last several years on the job, I traveled throughout the remote rural US midwest relying on TomTom automotive GPS, a very accurate and reliable experience. This experience forms the basis for my expectaions relative to handhelds).
In reading the reviews, at times it appeared that the paid rewiew-writers glossed over the various unit's deficits. One can expect this. What was surprising, was the respondent owners who also glossed-over the deficits. Apparently, the reviews' respondents had drunk the coolaid.
I am very disappointed in the unit I purchased. The 2-D Compass appears frozen and does not point the correct direction. Also, I find the bundled topo map not functional. Garmin sold me junk. I feel taken. The disfunction of the compass should have been honestly reported. It would have been better if there was no map, and I only paid for a unit without one. Now, as remedy, Garmin offers the subsequent sale of more-accurate maps, offering no remedy for the disfunctional one they already sold me.
If the respondents of the various online reviews stopped glossing over the deficits, accurately stated them and demanded remedy/improvement; now we all would have better units.
Stop drinking the coolaid.