during review with the Payer I see that a faster pace value is lower in the graph, eg. is closer to x axis, an a slower speed is higher, eg. farther from the x axis.
I hope I'm being clear: a faster pace is shown in a lower position.
values on the axis are upside down as well, they grow as they go farther from x axis. so value and graph are consistent, but, a faster pace means less minute per km...
shouldn't it be shown the other way around?
Graphing normally starts from 0 at the x-y intersection and increases numerically. The y-axis is min/km. As a result pace of 1min/km would of course be lower down the y-axis than 10 min/km.
It's not a bug, it's the way graphs are generally drawn
Yes, you are correct, it's not a bug and graphs are generally drawn with the smaller values lower than the higher values which creates a visual effect that most of us can immediately recognize
BUT when graphing "pace" using the actual "pace value" the visual effect is upsidedown just like LILIUMDAVIDII said.
It would be an easy fix if the pace was converted to mph and graphed as mph but labeled as pace (min/mile). Then the pace graph would give the correct visual effect.
A rabbit by any other name is still a rabbit. Just because you call it a cow doesn't change anything.
Get used to what you are looking at. Either that or stand on your head :D