Connect misattributes activities and creates nonsensical suggestions

I could not find anybody else having this problem, so I am hoping I am doing something wrong - I started using Garmin Connect since buying a Fenix 7 Pro Solar a few months ago. Since then, I've found that it acts like it does not know me and mischaracterizes my activities and also makes suggestions for exercise that are utterly nonsensical.

Background: I am a 60 year old male runner. My (laboratory tested) max heart rate is 173 and my resting HR is 42 (sleep drops to 36-38). My (also laboratory tested) VO2Max is 50 and my threshold is 160.

I entered all this data in my profile, and I adjusted my zones to align with the Jack Daniels running zones. All that seems good and is working.

But what does not work is the application of these things to my activities and, therefore, to the training suggestions I receive. Examples:

- Today I went for a base run. I ran around 4 miles at 9:20 minute mile average pace with my heart rate average 126 bpm and a max of 139. The whole run was correctly logged in Garmin zone 2 (easy) and Jack Daniels' zone E (easy). Except - when I look at what Connect believed the run was it categorized it as a threshold run and assigned a training benefit consistent with a threshold run. It obviously was not a threshold run which, for me, would have been run at 153-159 beats per minute.

- When I woke up in the morning, Connect recommended I go for a "Base" run with 11:35 minute miles. That is much too slow for a base run for me (and connect should know this because it's been monitoring my runs (see the example above). 

So, right now, Connect is acting as nothing more than a fancy HRM for me. I got the watch so I could train better and use its suggestions for different kinds of runs at different times and get stronger. Instead, it seems to basically misinterpret who I am from a fitness point of view, what I am doing, and how I am training. 

Is this happening only to me? What am I missing?

  • Will do.

    One thing that is interesting is that when I first got the watch it estimated my V02 max lower than the lab. Over the course of following 4-6 weeks it slowly moved it up until it's within the margin of error of what the lab found (50 according to the lab, 48 according to the watch).

    That the V02 max converged but the run assessments did not is odd to my thinking.

  • Just to close this thread - after wearing the band for a few months the watch's assessment of what is going on is spot-on. It is interesting that there does not seem to be much difference between the HR measured by my watch and the HR measured by the band, but the calculations made with the band are much more accurate. My dream of a sports watch that does not require me to wear a band to get full accurate information is not yet realized.